Back

Paracrine enhancement of tumor cell proliferation provides indirect stroma-mediated chemoresistance via acceleration of tumor recovery between chemotherapy cycles.

Marusyk, A.; Miroshnychenko, D.; Miti, T.; Miller, A. K.; Kumar, P.; Laurie, M.; Bui, M. M.; Altrock, P. M.; Basanta, D.

2023-02-08 cancer biology
10.1101/2023.02.07.527543 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The ability of tumors to survive therapy reflects both cell-intrinsic and microenvironmental mechanisms. Across many cancers, including triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), a high stroma/tumor ratio correlates with poor survival. In many contexts, this correlation can be explained by the direct reduction of therapy sensitivity by stroma-produced paracrine factors. We sought to explore whether this direct effect contributes to the link between stroma and poor responses to chemotherapies. Our in vitro studies with panels of TNBC cell line models and stromal isolates failed to detect a direct modulation of chemoresistance. At the same time, consistent with prior studies, we observed treatment-independent enhancement of tumor cell proliferation by fibroblast-produced secreted factors. Using spatial statistics analyses, we found that proximity to stroma is often associated with enhanced tumor cell proliferation in vivo. Based on these observations, we hypothesized an indirect link between stroma and chemoresistance, where stroma-augmented proliferation potentiates the recovery of residual tumors between chemotherapy cycles. To evaluate the feasibility of this hypothesis, we developed a spatial agent-based model of stroma impact on proliferation/death dynamics. The model was quantitatively parameterized using inferences from histological analyses and experimental studies. We found that the observed enhancement of tumor cell proliferation within stroma-proximal niches can enable tumors to avoid elimination over multiple chemotherapy cycles. Therefore, our study supports the existence of a novel, indirect mechanism of environment-mediated chemoresistance that might contribute to the negative correlation between stromal content and poor therapy outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
23.5%
2
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.5%
3
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
5.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.4%
5
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 19%
3.7%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.4%
8
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.7%
9
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.2%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.0%
11
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.8%
12
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.0%
14
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
15
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
16
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
17
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
18
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
20
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Cell Death & Disease
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.5%
26
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.5%