Back

A comparative study on the impact of five Desmodium species on soil microbiome reveals enrichment of selected bacterial and fungal taxa

David, A. B.; Mwaikono, K. S.; Midega, C.; Magingo, F.; Alsanius, B. W.; Drinkwater, L. E.; Dekker, T.; Lyantagaye, S.

2023-02-09 ecology
10.1101/2023.02.07.527423 bioRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionSeveral Desmodium spp. are used as intercrops in push-pull pest management systems to repel insect herbivores. In addition, Desmodium suppresses the parasitic weed Striga, and diversifies the soil microbiome with negative impacts on fungi. We investigated the impact of a 2-year cropping of five Desmodium species on soil microbiome populations. MethodologyTotal DNA was obtained from root zone soil samples collected from a two-years-old common garden experiment with replicated plots of five Desmodium spp. at the international centre for insect physiology and ecology (ICIPE), Mbita, Kenya. Subsequently, 16S and ITS DNA sequencing were performed and the data was analysed by using QIIME2 and Calypso. ResultsOur findings show significant differences in composition and abundance of specific microbial taxa among the Desmodium plots and the bulk soil, with a stronger shift observed for fungal community profiles than bacteria. There was, however, no significant difference in overall diversity, richness and evenness of microbial communities among the Desmodium plots and the bulk soil. Similarly, beta diversity analysis did not reveal a significant association of variation to specific Desmodium spp. plots. Discussion and conclusionThis is the first study to compare impact and association of whole soil microbiomes to different Desmodium species. Whereas long-term Desmodium cropping clearly shifts whole microbiome communities, no significant difference in overall diversity and richness of microbial populations was observed among the studied plots. However, there was a divergence of individual taxa reflected on their increased abundance in association to specific Desmodium spp., pointing towards potential impact on ecosystem services. These findings indicate that significant shifts in whole microbial populations due to Desmodium spp. and thus potentially provision of associated ecosystem services require longer cultivation periods to solidify. Future studies should focus on techniques that monitor real-time changes in microbial populations such as RNA-seq to ascertain live and dead microbes, and thus infer ecological services.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 2%
33.6%
2
Microbial Ecology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.4%
4
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
6
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.4%
7
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
8
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
9
Current Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
10
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
11
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
12
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
15
Insects
36 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
16
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
17
Pest Management Science
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
18
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
Environmental Microbiome
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
20
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
Plant and Soil
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
24
Environmental DNA
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
25
GeoHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
26
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
27
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
29
Phytobiomes Journal
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.5%
30
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%