Poor evidence for an effect of tecovirimat in shortening recovery time in hospitalized mpox cases from real-world data
Mazzotta, V.; Cozzi Lepri, A.; Lanini, S.; Mondi, A.; Carletti, F.; Tavelli, A.; Gagliardini, R.; Vita, S.; Pinnetti, C.; Aguglia, C.; Faccendini, P.; Colavita, F.; Faraglia, F.; Beccacece, A.; Paulicelli, J.; Girardi, E.; Nicastri, E.; Vaia, F.; Maggi, F.; Antinori, A.
Show abstract
ObjectivesTo assess the effectiveness of tecovirimat (TPOXX) for treating mpox in terms of difference in healing time and extent of viral clearance. DesignEmulation of a target trial based on observational data. SettingItaly ParticipantsForty-one men hospitalized for mpox as of September 29th, 2022. Main outcome measuresMain outcome was the time to clinical recovery. Secondary outcome was the variation in viral load in the upper respiratory tract (URT) after treatment. ResultsThe median time from symptoms onset to hospital admission and to initiation of TPOXX was 4 days (IQR 2-6) and 10 days (IQR 8-11), respectively. Fifteen patients completed a course of therapy. No deaths were observed; the overall median healing time was 21 days (IQR 17-26). We found no evidence for a significant improvement in recovery time in treated vs. untreated patients, with an estimated mean of 14.7 days for both groups. A subset of 13 patients had URT samples at T1 (median of 5 days (IQR 3-7) from symptoms onset) and T2 (median 7 days (IQR 7-9) from T1). Overall, mean viral load was 4.65 (0.30) vs. 4.91 (0.35) (log2 scale of cycle threshold) at T1 and T2, respectively. In the unadjusted analysis, variation over T1-T2 was lower in the treated 0.13 log2 (SD=0.53) vs. untreated 0.37 (0.50), although not statistically significant (unpaired t-test p=0.41). After controlling for confounding, there was no evidence for a difference in the potential changes over T1-T2 by treatment arm, and our estimate of the average treatment effect (ATE) was consistent with no difference by treatment group, although with large 95% CI around these estimates. ConclusionsOur analysis seems to exclude a clinically important effect of TPOXX in hospitalized mpox patients when compared to no treatment. These data are one of the valuable currently available sources of evidence to guide treatment decisions in patients hospitalized with TPOXX. Pending more robust data from randomized comparisons, the use of TPOXX should be restricted to the clinical trials setting. Trial registration"MpoxCohort" observational study protocol: approval number 40z, Register of Non-Covid Trials 2022.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Antiviral drugs in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 - the DisCoVeRy trial 96%
- An open-label randomized, controlled trial of the effect of lopinavir/ritonavir, lopinavir/ritonavir plus IFN-β-1a and hydroxychloroquine in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 – Final results from the DisCoVeRy trial 96%
- A placebo-controlled double blind trial of hydroxychloroquine in mild-to-moderate COVID-19 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Favipiravir for treatment of outpatients with asymptomatic or uncomplicated COVID-19: a double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial 94%
- Real-World Effectiveness Of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir On COVID-19-Associated Hospitalization Prevention: A Population-Based Cohort Study In The Province Of Québec, Canada 93%
- Single-dose effectiveness of mpox vaccine in Quebec, Canada: test-negative design with and without adjustment for self-reported exposure risk 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety and effectiveness of RBD-specific polyclonal equine F(ab′)2 fragments for the treatment of hospitalized patients with severe Covid-19 disease: a retrospective cohort study 94%
- Immune response induced by the Recombinant Novel Coronavirus Vaccine (Adenovirus Type 5 Vector) (Ad5-nCoV) in persons living with HIV (PLWH) 93%
- The COVID HOME study research protocol: Prospective cohort study of non-hospitalised COVID-19 patients 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Favorable outcome on viral load and culture viability using Ivermectin in early treatment of non-hospitalized patients with mild COVID-19, A double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial. 95%
- Efficacy of remdesivir in hospitalised COVID-19 patients in Japan: A large observational study using the COVID-19 Registry Japan 93%
- Effectiveness of the neutralizing antibody sotrovimab among high-risk patients with mild to moderate SARS-CoV-2 in Qatar 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Intramuscular Versus Intravenous SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibody Sotrovimab for Treatment of COVID-19 (COMET-TAIL): A Randomized Non-inferiority Clinical Trial 93%
- Safety, Virology, Pharmacokinetics, and Clinical Experience of High-dose Intravenous Sotrovimab for the Treatment of Mild to Moderate COVID-19: An Open-label Clinical Trial 92%
- Quantifying potential immortal time bias in observational studies in acute severe infection 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.