A cell-level discriminative neural network model for diagnosis of blood cancers
Robles, E. E.; Jin, Y.; Smyth, P.; Scheuermann, R. H.; Bui, J. D.; Wang, H.-Y.; Oak, J.; Qian, Y.
Show abstract
MotivationPrecise identification of cancer cells in patient samples is essential for accurate diagnosis and clinical monitoring but has been a significant challenge in machine learning approaches for cancer precision medicine. In most scenarios, training data are only available with disease annotation at the subject or sample level. Traditional approaches separate the classification process into multiple steps that are optimized independently. Recent methods either focus on predicting sample-level diagnosis without identifying individual pathologic cells or are less effective for identifying heterogeneous cancer cell phenotypes. ResultsWe developed a generalized end-to-end differentiable model, the Cell Scoring Neural Network (CSNN), which takes the available sample-level training data and predicts both the diagnosis of the testing samples and the identity of the diagnostic cells in the sample, simultaneously. The cell-level density differences between samples are linked to the sample diagnosis, which allows the probabilities of individual cells being diagnostic to be calculated using backpropagation. We applied CSNN to two independent clinical flow cytometry datasets for leukemia diagnosis. In both qualitative and quantitative assessments, CSNN outperformed preexisting neural network modeling approaches for both cancer diagnosis and cell-level classification. Post hoc decision trees and 2D dot plots were generated for interpretation of the identified cancer cells, showing that the identified cell phenotypes match the cancer endotypes observed clinically in patient cohorts. Independent data clustering analysis confirmed the identified cancer cell populations. AvailabilityThe source code of CSNN and datasets used in the experiments are publicly available on GitHub and FlowRepository. ContactEdgar E. Robles: roblesee@uci.edu and Yu Qian: mqian@jcvi.org Supplementary informationSupplementary data are available on GitHub and at Bioinformatics online.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Knowledge transfer to enhance the performance of deep learning models for automated classification of B-cell neoplasms 95%
- cytoGPNet: Enhancing Clinical Outcome Prediction Accuracy Using Longitudinal Cytometry Data in Small Cohort Studies 93%
- Federated Learning for multi-omics: a performance evaluation in Parkinson's disease 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Image-based Explainable Artificial Intelligence Accurately Identifies Myelodysplastic Neoplasms Beyond Conventional Signs of Dysplasia 96%
- Annotation-Free Deep Learning for Predicting Gene Mutations from Whole Slide Images of Acute Myeloid Leukemia 96%
- Cell graph neural networks enable the digital staging of tumor microenvironment and precise prediction of patient survival in gastric cancer 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.