Back

Intraoral thermal processing in the gustatory cortex of awake mice

Bouaichi, C. G.; Neese, C.; Vincis, R.

2023-02-06 neuroscience
10.1101/2023.02.06.526681 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Oral temperature is a sensory cue relevant to food preference and nutrition. To understand how orally-sourced thermal inputs are represented in the gustatory cortex (GC) we recorded neural responses from the GC of male and female mice presented with deionized water at different innocuous temperatures (14 {degrees}C, 25 {degrees}C, 36 {degrees}C) and taste stimuli (room temperature). Our results demonstrate that GC neurons encode orally-sourced thermal information in the absence of classical taste qualities at the single neuron and population levels, as confirmed through additional experiments comparing GC neuron responses to water and artificial saliva. Analysis of thermal-evoked responses showed broadly tuned neurons that responded to temperature in a mostly monotonic manner. Spatial location may play a minor role regarding thermosensory activity; aside from the most ventral GC, neurons reliably responded to and encoded thermal information across the dorso-ventral and antero-postero cortical axes. Additional analysis revealed that more than half of GC neurons that encoded chemosensory taste stimuli also accurately discriminated thermal information, providing additional evidence of the GCs involvement in processing thermosensory information important for ingestive behaviors. In terms of convergence, we found that GC neurons encoding information about both taste and temperature were broadly tuned and carried more information than taste-selective only neurons; both groups encoded similar information about the palatability of stimuli. Altogether, our data reveal new details of the cortical code for the mammalian intraoral thermosensory system in behaving mice and pave the way for future investigations on GC functions and operational principles with respect to thermogustation.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.