Back

Automatic Whole Body FDG PET/CT Lesion Segmentation using Residual UNet and Adaptive Ensemble

Murugesan, G. K.; Mccrumb, D.; Brunner, E.; Kumar, J.; Soni, R.; Grigorash, V.; Chang, A.; VanOss, J.; Moore, S.

2023-02-07 bioengineering
10.1101/2023.02.06.525233 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Multimodal Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) plays a key role in the diagnosis, staging, restaging, treatment response assessment, and radiotherapy planning of malignant tumors. The complementary nature of high-resolution anatomic CT and high sensitivity/specificity molecular PET imaging provides accurate assessment of disease status [14] In oncology, 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT is the most widely used method to identify and analyze metabolically active tumors. In particular, FDG uptake allows for more accurate detection of both nodal and distant forms of metastatic disease. Accurate quantification and staging of tumors is the most important prognostic factor for predicting the survival of patients and for designing personalized patient management plans. [8,3] Analyzing PET/CT quantitatively by experienced medical imaging experts/radiologists is timeconsuming and error-prone. Automated quantitative analysis by deep learning algorithms to segment tumor lesions will enable accurate feature extraction, tumor staging, radiotherapy planning, and treatment response assessment. The AutoPET Challenge 2022 provided an opensource platform to develop and benchmark deep learning models for automated PET lesion segmentation by providing large open-source wholebody FDG-PET/CT data. Using the multimodal PET/CT data from 900 subjects with 1014 studies provided by the AutoPET MICCAI 2022 Challenge, we applied fivefold cross-validation on residual UNETs to automatically segment lesions. We then utilized the output from adaptive ensemble highly contributive models as the final segmentation. Our method achieved a 10th ranking with a dice score of 0.5541 in the heldout test dataset (N=150 studies).

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.0%
2
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
3
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
4
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
5
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.7%
7
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.7%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.2%
9
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
11
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
12
Photoacoustics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
Physics in Medicine & Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
14
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
15
Neuro-Oncology Advances
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
16
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
18
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.8%
19
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
23
Radiotherapy and Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
Journal of Pathology Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
25
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
26
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
28
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
29
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%