Back

Analysis of electronic health records from three distinct and large populations reveals high prevalence and biases in the co-administration of drugs known to interact

Sanchez-Valle, J.; Correia, R. B.; Camacho, M.; Lepore, R.; Mattos, M.; Rocha, L.; Valencia, A.

2023-02-08 health informatics
10.1101/2023.02.06.23285566 medRxiv
Show abstract

The co-administration of drugs known to interact has a high impact on morbidity, mortality, and health economics. We study the drug-drug interaction (DDI) phenomenon by analyzing drug administrations from population-wide Electronic Health Records (EHR) in Blumenau (Brazil), Catalonia (Spain), and Indianapolis (USA). Despite very different health care systems and drug availability, we find a common large risk of DDI administration that affected 13 to 20% of patients in these populations. In addition, the increasing risk of DDI as patients age is very similar across all three populations but is not explained solely by higher co-administration rates in the elderly. We also find that women are at higher risk of DDI overall-- except for men over 50 years old in Indianapolis. Finally, we show that PPI alternatives to Omeprazole can reduce the number of patients affected by known DDIs by up to 21% in both Blumenau and Catalonia, and 2% in Indianapolis, exemplifying how analysis of EHR data can lead to a significant reduction of DDI and its associated human and economic costs. Although the risk of DDIs increases with age, administration patterns point to a complex phenomenon that cannot be solely explained by polypharmacy and multimorbidity. The lack of safer drug alternatives, particularly for chronic conditions, further overburdens health systems, thus highlighting the need for disruptive drug research.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
18.4%
2
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
10.0%
4
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
5
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.5%
6
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.5%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.1%
10
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.8%
11
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
12
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 43%
1.7%
14
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
15
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
16
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
17
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
18
BioData Mining
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
19
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
20
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
21
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
22
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
23
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
24
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
25
BMC Medical Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
28
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%