Back

SaLTy: a novel Staphylococcus aureus Lineage Typer

Cheney, L.; Payne, M.; Kaur, S.; Lan, R.

2023-02-07 microbiology
10.1101/2023.02.03.527095 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Staphylococcus aureus asymptomatically colonises 30% of humans and in 2017 was associated with 20,000 deaths in the USA alone. Dividing S. aureus into smaller sub-groups can reveal the emergence of distinct sub-populations with varying potential to cause infections. Despite multiple molecular typing methods categorising such sub-groups, they do not take full advantage of S. aureus WGS when describing the fundamental population structure of the species. In this study, we developed Staphylococcus aureus Lineage Typing (SaLTy), which rapidly divides the species into 61 phylogenetically congruent lineages. Alleles of three core genes were identified that uniquely define the 61 lineages and were used for SaLTy typing. SaLTy was validated on 5,000 genomes and 99.12% (4,956/5,000) of isolates were assigned the correct lineage. We compared SaLTy lineages to previously calculated clonal complexes (CCs) from BIGSdb (n=21,173). SALTy improves on CCs by grouping isolates congruently with phylogenetic structure. SaLTy lineages were further used to describe the carriage of Staphylococcal chromosomal cassette containing mecA (SCCmec) which is carried by methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Most lineages had isolates lacking SCCmec and the four largest lineages varied in SCCmec over time. Classifying isolates into SaLTy lineages, which were further SCCmec typed, allowed SaLTy to describe high-level MRSA epidemiology We provide SALTy as a simple typing method that defines phylogenetic lineages (https://github.com/LanLab/SaLTy). SALTy is highly accurate and can quickly analyse large amounts of S. aureus WGS. SALTy will aid the characterisation of S. aureus populations and the ongoing surveillance of sub-groups that threaten human health.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.