Back

Combined multiphoton microscopy and somatostatin receptor type 2 imaging of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Daigle, N.; Knapp, T.; Duan, S.; Jones, D. W.; Azhdarinia, A.; Ghosh, S. C.; AghaAmiri, S.; Ikoma, N.; Estrella, J. S.; Schnermann, M. J.; Merchant, J. L.; Sawyer, T. W.

2023-02-03 bioengineering
10.1101/2023.02.03.526958 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are a rare but increasingly more prevalent cancer with heterogeneous clinical and pathological presentation. Surgery is the preferred treatment for all hormone-expressing PNETs and any PNET greater than 2 cm, but difficulties arise when tumors are multifocal, metastatic, or small in size due to lack of effective surgical localization. Existing techniques such as intraoperative ultrasound provide poor contrast and resolution, resulting in low sensitivity for such tumors. Somatostatin receptor type 2 (SSTR2) is commonly overexpressed in PNETs and presents an avenue for targeted tumor localization. SSTR2 is often used for pre-operative imaging and therapeutic treatment, with recent studies demonstrating that somatostatin receptor imaging (SRI) can be applied in radioguided surgery to aid in removal of metastatic lymph nodes and achieving negative surgical margins. However not all PNETs express SSTR2, indicating labeled SRI could benefit from using a supplemental label-free technique such as multiphoton microscopy (MPM), which has proven useful in improving the accuracy of diagnosing more common exocrine pancreatic cancers. Our work tests the suitability of combined SRI and MPM for localizing PNETs by imaging and comparing samples of PNETs and normal pancreatic tissue. Specimens were labeled with a novel SSTR2-targeted contrast agent and imaged using fluorescence microscopy, and subsequently imaged using MPM to collect four autofluo-rescent channels and second harmonic generation. Our results show that a combination of both SRI and MPM provides enhanced contrast and sensitivity for localizing diseased tissue, suggesting that this approach could be a valuable clinical tool for surgical localization and treatment of PNETs.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Biomedical Optics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.6%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 4%
10.7%
3
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.9%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.4%
6
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.1%
7
Translational Vision Science & Technology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
8
Photoacoustics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
9
Journal of Pathology Informatics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
10
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
11
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
12
Neurophotonics
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
13
ACS Sensors
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
14
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
15
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
16
Physics in Medicine & Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
17
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
18
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
19
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.9%
20
Cancer Research Communications
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
International Journal of Biological Sciences
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
22
Bioconjugate Chemistry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
23
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
24
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%