Accuracy and reliability of self-administered visual acuity tests: Systematic review of pragmatic trials
Thirunavukarasu, A.; Hassan, R.; Limonard, A.; Savant, S. V.
Show abstract
BackgroundRemote self-administered visual acuity (VA) tests have the potential to allow patients and non-specialists to assess vision without eye health professional input. Validation in pragmatic trials is necessary to demonstrate the accuracy and reliability of tests in relevant settings to justify deployment. MethodsA systematic review was undertaken in accordance with a preregistered protocol (CRD42022385045). The Cochrane Library, Embase, MEDLINE, and Scopus were searched. Screening was conducted according to the following criteria: (1) English languge; (2) primary research article; (3) visual acuity test conducted remotely; (4) no clinical administration of remote test; (5) accuracy or reliability of remote test analysed. There were no restrictions on trial participants. Quality assessment was conducted with QUADAS-2. ResultsOf 1227 identified reports, 10 studies were ultimately included. One study was at high risk of bias and two studies exhibited concerning features of bias; all studies were applicable. Three trials--of DigiVis, iSight Professional, and Peek Acuity--from two studies suggested that accuracy of the remote tests was comparable to clinical assessment. All other trials exhibited inferior accuracy, including conflicting results from a pooled study of iSight Professional and Peek Acuity. Two studies evaluated test-retest agreement--one trial provided evidence that DigiVis is as reliable as clinical assessment. The three most accurate tests required access to digital devices. Reporting was inconsistent and often incomplete, particularly with regards to describing methods and conducting statistical analysis. ConclusionsRemote self-administered VA tests appear promising, but further pragmatic trials are indicated to justify deployment at scale to facilitate patient or non-specialist led assessment which could augment teleophthalmology, non-specialist eye assessment, pre-consultation triage, and autonomous long-term monitoring of vision.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Relating Standardized Automated Perimetry Performed with Stimulus Sizes III and V in Eyes With Field Loss due to Glaucoma and NAION 95%
- Visual field evaluation using Zippy Adaptive Threshold Algorithm (ZATA) Standard and ZATA Fast in patients with glaucoma and healthy individuals 95%
- The learning curve of murine subretinal injection among clinically trained ophthalmic surgeons 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Refractive Error and Vision Impairment Estimation With Spectacle data (REVIEWS) study 95%
- Autonomous screening for Diabetic Macular Edema using deep learning processing of retinal images 94%
- Validity and Reliability of the CVI Range for Clinical Research (CVI Range-CR): Baseline and One-Year Results 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated Expert-level Scleral Spur Detection and Quantitative Biometric Analysis on the ANTERION Anterior Segment OCT System 95%
- Macula structural and vascular differences in glaucoma eyes with and without high axial myopia 95%
- Risk Model for Intraoperative Complication during Cataract Surgery Based on Data from 900,000 Eyes – Previous Intravitreal Injection is a Risk Factor 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Diagnostic Performance of Deep Learning in Infectious Keratitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocol 96%
- Prevalence, incidence and risk factors for myopia among urban and rural children in southern China: protocol for a school-based cohort study 95%
- One and Two Year Visual Outcomes from the Moorfields AMD Database - an Open Science Resource for the Study of Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated vision screening of children using a mobile graphic device 96%
- Increasing frequency of hospital admissions for retinal detachment and vitreo-retinal surgery in England 2000-2018 94%
- An Open-Source Dataset Of Anti-Vegf Therapy In Diabetic Macular Oedema Patients Over Four Years & Their Visual Outcomes 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.