The double-drift illusion biases the marmoset oculomotor system
Dotson, N. M.; Davis, Z. W.; Salisbury, J. M.; Palmer, S. E.; Cavanagh, P.; Reynolds, J.
Show abstract
The double-drift illusion has two unique characteristics: the error between the perceived and physical position of the stimulus grows over time, and saccades to the moving target land much closer to the physical than the perceived location. These results suggest that the perceptual and saccade targeting systems integrate visual information over different timescales. Functional imaging studies in humans have revealed several potential cortical areas of interest, including the prefrontal cortex. However, we currently lack an animal model to study the neural mechanisms of location perception that underlie the double-drift illusion. To fill this gap, we trained two marmoset monkeys to fixate and then saccade to the double drift stimulus. In line with human observers for radial double-drift trajectories, we find that saccade endpoints do show a significant bias that is, as it is in humans, smaller than that seen in perception. This bias is modulated by changes in the external and internal speeds of the stimulus. These results demonstrate that the saccade targeting system of the marmoset monkey is influenced by the double-drift illusion.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Different extrapolation of moving object locations in perception, smooth pursuit and saccades 97%
- Dependence of perceptual saccadic suppression on peri-saccadic image flow properties and luminance contrast polarity 96%
- Smooth Pursuit Inhibition Reveals Audiovisual Enhancement of Fast Movement Control 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Visual feature tuning properties of short-latency stimulus-driven ocular position drift responses during gaze fixation 96%
- The representation of stimulus features during stable fixation and active vision 95%
- Featural representation and internal noise underlie the eccentricity effect in contrast sensitivity 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.