Back

Starvation response strategies impact the interaction dynamics of human gut bacteria: a study of Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron and Roseburia intestinalis

Liu, B.; Garza, D. R.; Gonze, D.; Krzynowek, A.; Simoens, K.; Bernaerts, K.; Geirnaert, A.; Faust, K.

2023-02-17 microbiology
10.1101/2023.02.02.526806 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Bacterial growth often alters the environment, which in turn can impact interspecies interactions among bacteria. Here, we used an in vitro batch system containing mucin beads to emulate the dynamic host environment and to study its impact on the interactions between two abundant and prevalent human gut bacteria, the primary fermenter Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron and the butyrate producer Roseburia intestinalis. By combining machine learning and flow cytometry, we found that the number of viable B. thetaiotaomicron cells decreases with glucose consumption due to acid production, while R. intestinalis survives post-glucose depletion by entering a slow growth mode. Both species attach to mucin beads, but only viable cell counts of B. thetaiotaomicron increase significantly. The number of viable co-culture cells varies significantly over time compared to those of monocultures. A combination of targeted metabolomics and RNA-seq showed that the slow growth mode of R. intestinalis represents a diauxic shift towards acetate and lactate consumption, whereas B. thetaiotaomicron survives glucose depletion and low pH by foraging on mucin sugars. In addition, most of the mucin monosaccharides we tested inhibited the growth of R. intestinalis but not B. thetaiotaomicron. We encoded these causal relationships in a kinetic model, which reproduced the observed dynamics. In summary, we explored how R. intestinalis and B. thetaiotaomicron respond to nutrient scarcity and how this affects their dynamics. We highlight the importance of understanding bacterial metabolic strategies to effectively modulate microbial dynamics in changing conditions.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
43.9%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 4%
8.9%
50% of probability mass above
3
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.7%
4
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.8%
5
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.8%
6
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.4%
7
Gut Microbes
70 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.5%
8
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.2%
9
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.2%
10
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.0%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.6%
12
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 68%
1.2%
14
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.9%
16
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.9%
17
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
18
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.8%
19
Microbial Biotechnology
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
20
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
21
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
23
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.5%
24
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%
25
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 48%
0.5%
26
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%