Back

Effects of pathogen sexual reproduction on the evolutionary and epidemiological control provided by deployment strategies for two major resistance genes in agricultural landscapes.

ZAFFARONI, M.; Rimbaud, L.; Rey, J.-F.; Papaix, J.; Fabre, F.

2023-02-03 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2023.02.02.526796 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIResistant cultivars are of value for protecting crops from disease, but can be rapidly overcome by pathogens. Several strategies have been proposed to delay pathogen adaptation (evolutionary control), while maintaining effective protection (epidemiological control). Resistance genes can be i) combined in the same cultivar (pyramiding), ii) deployed in different cultivars sown in the same field (mixtures) or in different fields (mosaics), or iii) alternated over time (rotations). The outcomes of these strategies have been investigated principally in pathogens displaying pure clonal reproduction, but sexual reproduction may promote the emergence of superpathogens adapted to all the resistance genes deployed. C_LIO_LIWe improved the spatially explicit stochastic model landsepi to include pathogen sexual reproduction, and then investigate the effect of sexual reproduction on evolutionary and epidemiological outcomes across deployment strategies for two major resistance genes. C_LIO_LISexual reproduction only favours the establishment of a superpathogen when single mutant pathogens are present together at a sufficiently high frequency, as in mosaic and mixture strategies. C_LIO_LIWe concluded that, although sexual reproduction may promote the establishment of a superpathogen, it did not affect the optimal strategy recommendations for a wide range of mutation probabilities, associated fitness costs, and landscape organisations (notably the cropping ratio of resistant fields). C_LI

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.