Back

Multi-species polyploidization, chromosome shuffling, and genome extraction in Zea/Tripsacum hybrids

Iqbal, M. Z.; Wen, X.; Lulu, X.; Zhao, Y.; Jing, L.; Weiming, J.; Mingjun, C.; Li, H.; Li, Y.; Xiaofeng, L.; He, R.; He, J.; Yan, P.; Rong, T.; Tang, Q.

2023-02-03 genetics
10.1101/2023.02.02.526764 bioRxiv
Show abstract

By hybridization and special sexual reproduction, we sequentially aggregated Zea mays, Zea perennis, and Tripsacum dactyloides in an allohexaploid, backcrossed it with maize, derived self-fertile allotetraploids of maize and Z. perennis by natural genome extraction, extended their first six selfed generations, and finally constructed amphitetraploid maize using nascent allotetraploids as a genetic bridge. Transgenerational chromosome inheritance, subgenomes stability, chromosome pairings and rearrangements, and their impacts on an organisms fitness were investigated by fertility phenotyping and molecular cytogenetics techniques GISH and FISH. Results showed that diversified sexual reproductive methods produced highly differentiated progenies (2n=35-84) with varying proportions of subgenomic chromosomes, of which one individual (2n=54, MMMPT) overcame self-incompatibility barriers and produced self-fertile nascent near-allotetraploid by preferentially eliminating Tripsacum chromosomes. Nascent near-allotetraploid progenies showed persistent chromosome changes, intergenomic translocations, and rDNA variations for at least up to the first six selfed generations; however, ploidy tended to stabilize at near-tetraploid level (2n=40) with full integrity of 45SrDNA pairs, and a trend of decreasing variations by advancing generations with an average of 25.53, 14.14, and 0.37 maize, Z. perennis, and T. dactyloides chromosomes, respectively. The mechanisms for three genome stabilities and karyotype evolution for formatting new polyploid species were discussed.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.