Back

Lianas in tropical dry forests have higher embolism resistance but similar hydraulic efficiency than lianas in rainforests

Gerolamo, C. S.; Pereira, L.; Costa, F. R. C.; Jansen, S.; Angyalossy, V.; Nogueira, A.

2023-02-02 plant biology
10.1101/2023.02.01.526653 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Lianas are increasing in relative abundance and biomass, mainly in seasonally dry forests, but it is unclear if this is associated with their hydraulic strategy. Here, we ask whether liana of seasonally dry forests are safer and more efficient in water transport than those of rainforest, which could explain liana distribution patterns and their recent increases. We measured hydraulic traits on five pairs of congeneric liana species (tribe Bignonieae) on one seasonal dry Atlantic forest and one Amazon rainforest. The predawn and minimum water potential, and the water potential at which 50% of the maximum gas amount was discharged were, on average, more negative in the liana species of the seasonal forest. However, these patterns were not constant at the genus level. The positive hydraulic safety margins and hydraulic efficiency were similar among species congeners across sites. The Bignonieae lianas studied likely experience equally low levels of embolism during drought, and maintain a high conductive capacity with efficient use of xylem space, which may favor survival and growth across tropical forests. The likely evolutionary convergence of high hydraulic safety associated with the opportunistic strategy of rapid growth, especially in disturbed areas can favor the abundant liana species in seasonal forests. HighlightTropical forest liana species have high hydraulic efficiency and high interspecific variability in hydraulic safety. Despite this variability, some seasonal forest liana species have greater hydraulic safety than rainforest lianas, indicating an evolutionary convergence across lineages.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Tree Physiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.2%
2
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.1%
3
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
9.9%
4
Annals of Botany
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.2%
6
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.5%
8
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
9
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
10
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 28%
2.0%
12
AoB PLANTS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
13
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
14
American Journal of Botany
41 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
15
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
16
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
17
Journal of Biogeography
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
18
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
Biotropica
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
20
Physiologia Plantarum
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
21
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.7%
23
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
24
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.7%
25
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.7%
27
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%