Prediction of Gastrointestinal Bleeding Hospitalization in Hemodialysis
Larkin, J. W.; Lama, S.; Chaudhuri, S.; Willetts, J.; Winter, A. C.; Jiao, Y.; Stauss-Grabo, M.; Usvyat, L. A.; Hymes, J. L.; Maddux, F. W.; Wheeler, D. C.; Stenvinkel, P.; Floege, J.; On behalf of the INSPIRE Core Group,
Show abstract
Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a clinical challenge in kidney failure. The INSPIRE group assessed if machine learning could assist with determining a hemodialysis (HD) patients 180-day GIB hospitalization risk. Model was developed using adult HD patient data from United States (2017-2020). Patient data was randomly split (50% training, 30% validation, and 20% testing). HD treatments [≤] 180 days before GIB hospitalization were classified as positive observations, and others were negative observations. Datasets were randomly sampled to build an XGBoost model that considered 386 exposures initially and was refined to the top 50 exposures. Unseen testing dataset was used to determine final model performance. Incidence of 180-day GIB hospitalization was 1.18% in the HD population (n=451,579), and 1.16% among patients in the testing dataset (n=27,991). Model showed an area under the curve=0.69, sensitivity=57.9%, specificity=68.9%, accuracy=68.8% and balanced accuracy=63.4%. Exposures with largest effect size per Shapley values were older age (group mean GIB event=68.2 years vs no GIB event=63.4 years), shorter days since last all-cause hospital admission (group mean GIB event=203.2 days vs no GIB event=253.2 days), and higher serum 25-hydroxy (OH) vitamin D levels from most recent lab (group mean GIB event=33.4 ng/mL vs no GIB event=30.5 ng/mL). Other important predictors included lower hemoglobin and iron indices, longer dialysis vintage, and proton pump inhibitor use. Model appears suitable for early detection of GIB event risk in HD, yet prospective testing is needed. The association between higher 25OH vitamin D and GIB events was unexpected and warrants investigation.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating the kidney disease progression using a comprehensive patient profiling algorithm: A hybrid clustering approach 95%
- Efficacy of Tenapanor in Managing Hyperphosphatemia and Constipation in Hemodialysis Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
- Fatigue in Incident Peritoneal Dialysis and Mortality: A Real-World Side-by-Side Study in Brazil and the United States 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating and predicting kidney function decline in the general population 94%
- Artificial Intelligence for COVID-19 Risk Classification in Kidney Disease: Can Technology Unmask an Unseen Disease? 93%
- Packed Red Blood Cell and Whole Blood Perfusates during an Ex-vivo Normothermic Perfusion for Assessment of High-Risk Donor Kidneys 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The mediating role of trust in physicians on the association between multidimensional health literacy and medication adherence in hemodialysis: A cross-sectional study 94%
- Circulating Plasma Biomarkers in Biopsy-Confirmed Kidney Disease: Results from the Boston Kidney Biopsy Cohort 92%
- Preprint server use in kidney disease research: a rapid review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Considering Shared Chairs in Outpatient Dialysis: A Real-World Case-Control Study 95%
- The Effect of Intradialytic Exercise on Dialysis Patient Survival: A Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
- Health-related hope and reduced distress associated with fluid and dietary restrictions in advanced chronic kidney disease and dialysis: a cohort study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Shared Decision-Making in Renal Replacement Therapy Selection: Patient Perceptions, Preferences, and Influencing Factors in a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study in Japan 94%
- Development and Validation of a Convolutional Neural Network Model for ICU Acute Kidney Injury Prediction 93%
- The prevalence of chronic kidney disease in Australian primary care: analysis of a national general practice dataset 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.