Immunogenicity and safety of SARS-CoV-2 recombinant protein nanoparticle vaccine GBP510 adjuvanted with AS03: randomised, active-controlled, observer-blinded, phase 3 trial
Song, J. Y.; Choi, W. S.; Kim, E. J.; Heo, J. Y.; Lee, J. S.; Jung, D. S.; Kim, S.-W.; Park, K.-H.; Eom, J. S.; Jeong, S. J.; Lee, J.; Kwon, K. T.; Choi, H. J.; Sohn, J. W.; Kim, Y. K.; Yoo, B. W.; Jang, I.-J.; Wysocki, P.; Roman, F.; Breuer, T.; Kim, H.; Ryu, J. H.; Park, Y. W.; Lee, S. J.; Sahastrabuddhe, S.; Song, M.; D'Cor, N.; Carter, L.; Capeding, M. R.; Philippot, A.; Solmi, F.; Ceregido, M.; Park, H.; Lee, Y. Y.; Thaisrivichai, P.; D'Souza, S.; Seo, S. H.; Shim, B.-S.; Carlos, J.; Alberto, E.; Nitayaphan, S.; Ratanasuwan, W.; Mootsikapun, P.; Chaiwarit, R.; Quang, L. C.; Karpenko, O.;
Show abstract
BackgroundGBP510 vaccine contains self-assembling, recombinant nanoparticles displaying SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domains. We report interim phase 3 immunogenicity results for GBP510 adjuvanted with AS03 (GBP510/AS03) compared with ChAdOx1-S (Vaxzevria, AstraZeneca) up to 2 weeks after the second dose, and safety data up to a median of 2.5 months follow-up. MethodsRandomised, active-controlled, observer-blinded, multinational study: Cohort 1 (no history of SARS-CoV-2 infection/COVID-19 vaccination, n=1956) randomised 2:1 to receive two doses of GBP510/AS03 or ChAdOx1-S (immunogenicity and safety); Cohort 2 (regardless of baseline serostatus; n=2080) randomised 5:1 (safety). Primary objectives: demonstrate superiority in geometric mean titre (GMT) and non-inferiority in seroconversion rate (SCR; [≥]4-fold rise from baseline) of GBP510/AS03 versus ChAdOx1-S for neutralising antibodies against the ancestral strain by live-virus neutralisation assay. Secondary objectives included assessment of safety and reactogenicity. FindingsAt 2 weeks after the second vaccination, the GMT ratio (GBP510/AS03 / ChAdOx1-S) was 2.93 (95% CI 2.63-3.27), demonstrating superiority (95% CI lower limit >1). The between-group SCR difference of 10.76% (95% CI 7.68-14.32) satisfied the non-inferiority criterion (95% CI lower limit > -5%).The proportion of subjects with adverse events (AEs) after any vaccination was higher with GBP510/AS03 versus ChAdOx1-S for solicited local AEs (56.69% vs 49.20%), but was similar for solicited systemic AEs (51.21% vs 53.51%) and unsolicited AEs (13.27% vs 14.56%). No safety concerns were identified during follow-up for a median 2.5-months after the second vaccination. InterpretationGBP510/AS03 met the superiority criterion for neutralising antibodies and non-inferiority criterion for SCR compared with ChAdOx1-S, and showed a clinically acceptable safety profile. FundingThis work was supported, in whole or in part, by funding from CEPI and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Investments INV-010680 and INV-006462. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation supported this project for the generation of IND-enabling data and CEPI supported this clinical study. RESEARCH IN CONTEXTO_ST_ABSEvidence before this studyC_ST_ABSImmunobridging has been proposed as an approach for assessing new COVID-19 vaccines by comparing the immunogenicity of candidate vaccines with an active comparator with demonstrated clinical efficacy. We searched PubMed up to 26 October 2022 for immunobridging clinical trials comparing a candidate vaccine with an approved vaccine, using the terms "immunobridging", "SARS-CoV-2", "COVID-19", and "vaccine". A phase 2/3 study showed that the ChAdOx1 vaccine, manufactured by the Serum Institute of India after technology transfer from Oxford University/AstraZeneca, had a non-inferior immune response compared to the original ChAdOx1 (AZD1222) vaccine. A post hoc analysis of phase 2 data found that MVC-COV1901 vaccine (a protein subunit vaccine developed by Medigen Vaccine Biologics Corporation, Taiwan) was non-inferior to ChAdOx1 (AZD1222) with respect to neutralising antibody titres. A phase 3 study found that VLA2001 (an adjuvanted, inactivated whole-virus vaccine developed by Valneva, Austria) was superior to ChAdOx1 with respect to neutralising antibody titres and non-inferior with respect to seroconversion rates. Added value of this studyThis is the first study comparing the immunogenicity of recombinant SARS-CoV-2 protein nanoparticle vaccine GBP510 adjuvanted with AS03 versus ChAdOx1-S. Interim analysis found that two-dose vaccination with GBP510/AS03 induced stronger neutralising antibody immune responses compared with ChAdOx1-S against the ancestral D614G strain at 2 weeks after the second dose. GBP510/AS03 had an acceptable safety profile during a median 2.5 months of follow-up. Implications of the available evidenceThis interim analysis suggests that GBP510/AS03 induces strong neutralising antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2 ancestral strain and has an acceptable safety profile.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety and immunogenicity of a SARS-CoV-2 recombinant protein vaccine with AS03 adjuvant in healthy adults: interim findings from a phase 2, randomised, dose-finding, multi-centre study 99%
- Safety and immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 recombinant protein vaccine formulations in healthy adults: a randomised, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study 98%
- Safety and immunogenicity clinical trial of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, BBV152 (a phase 2, double-blind, randomised controlled trial) and the persistence of immune responses from a phase 1 follow-up report 98%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety and Immunogenicity of an Inactivated Recombinant Newcastle Disease Virus Vaccine Expressing SARS-CoV-2 Spike: A Randomised, Comparator-Controlled, Phase 2 Trial 98%
- Immunogenicity and Safety of Booster Dose of S-268019-b or Tozinameran in Japanese Participants: An Interim Report of Phase 2/3, Randomized, Observer-Blinded, Noninferiority Study 98%
- Durability of antibody responses elicited by a single dose of Ad26.COV2.S and substantial increase following late boosting 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety and efficacy of two immunization schedules with an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in adults. A randomized non-inferiority clinical trial 98%
- Safety and immunogenicity of the BBIBP-CorV vaccine in adolescents aged 12-17 years in Thai population, prospective cohort study 96%
- Post-vaccination neutralization responses to Omicron sub-variants 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Immunogenicity of JN.1- and KP.2-Encoding mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines Against 1 JN.1 Subvariants in Adult Participants 97%
- Homologous and heterologous boosting of the ChAdOx1-S1-S COVID-19 vaccine with the SCB-2019 vaccine candidate: a randomized, observer-blinded, controlled, phase 2 study 96%
- Global Safety Assessment of Adverse Events of Special Interest Following 2 Years of Use and 772 Million Administered Doses of mRNA-1273 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.