Spatial uncertainty and environmental geometry in navigation
Kang, Y. H.; Wolpert, D. M.; Lengyel, M.
Show abstract
Knowing ones place in the world requires integrating sensory inputs with respect to the geometry of the environment. Consistent with this, variations in environmental geometry, such as the shape and size of an enclosure, have profound effects on navigational behavior1-4 and its neural underpinning in grid cells5-7. Here, we show that these effects arise as a consequence of a single, unifying principle: to navigate efficiently, the brain must maintain and update the uncertainty about ones location. We develop an image-computable Bayesian ideal observer model of navigation, continually combining noisy visual and self-motion inputs, and a neural encoding model representing the spatial uncertainty computed by the ideal observer. Critically, we find that a key determinant of spatial uncertainty is the dimensionality reduction inherent in the retinal projection of the environment. Mathematical analysis and simulations show that spatial uncertainty accounts for a diverse range of sometimes paradoxical distortions in human homing behavior across trapezoidal, stretched, and compressed environments. Moreover, the neural encoding of this uncertainty accounts for observed changes in grid field size, anisotropy, rescaling, and boundary-dependent tethering under analogous geometric manipulations. Our results show that spatial uncertainty arising unavoidably during navigation is key to understanding navigational behavior and its neural underpinnings.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A cortical circuit mechanism for coding and updating task structural knowledge in inference-based decision-making 98%
- Universal statistics of hippocampal place fields across species and dimensionalities 98%
- The hippocampus as a perceptual map: neuronal and behavioral discrimination during memory encoding 97%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.