Spectral signatures of cross-modal attentional control in the adolescent brain and their link with physical activity and aerobic fitness levels
Hernandez, D.; Kujala, J.; Heinila, E.; Ruotsalainen, I.; Lapinkero, H.-M.; Syvaoja, H.; Parkkonen, L.; Tammelin, T. H.; Parviainen, T.
Show abstract
Top-down attentional control seems to increase and suppress the activity of sensory cortices for relevant stimuli and to suppress activity for irrelevant ones. Higher physical activity (PA) and aerobic fitness (AF) levels have been associated with improved attention, but most studies have focused on unimodal tasks (e.g., visual stimuli only). The impact of higher PA or AF levels on the ability of developing brains to focus on certain stimuli while ignoring distractions remains unknown. The aim of this study was to examine the neural processes in visual and auditory sensory cortices during a cross-modal attention-allocation task using magnetoencephalography in 13-16-year-old adolescents (n = 51). During continuous and simultaneous visual (15 Hz) and auditory (40 Hz) noise-tagging stimulation, participants attended to either visual or auditory targets appearing on their left or right sides. High and low PA groups were formed based on seven-day accelerometer measurements, and high and low AF groups were determined based on the 20-m shuttle-run test. Steady-state (evoked) responses to the visual stimulus were observed in all the adolescents in the primary visual cortex, but some did not show responses in the primary auditory cortices to the auditory stimulus. The adolescents with auditory-tag-driven signals in the left temporal cortex were older than those who did not show responses. Visual cortices showed enhanced visual-tag-related activity with attention, but there was no cross-modal effect, perhaps due to the developmental effect observed in the temporal areas. The visual-tag-related responses in the occipital cortex were enhanced in the higher-PA group, irrespective of task demands. In summary, sensory cortices are unequally involved in cross-modal attention in the adolescent brain. This involvement seems to be enhanced by attention. Higher PA seems to be associated with a specific visual engagement benefit in the adolescent brain. Highlights- Visual and auditory cortices engagement differs in cross-modal processing in adolescence. - Adolescents with responses in the left temporal cortex are older than those without responses. - Physical activity, but not aerobic fitness, is associated with visual engagement benefits in the adolescent brain.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Role of the prefrontal cortex in musical and verbal short-term memory: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy study 95%
- The infant brain rapidly entrains to visual statistical regularities during stimulus exposure 95%
- Neural signatures of automatic letter-speech sound integration in literate adults 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rapid changes in brain activity during learning of grapheme-phoneme associations in adults 96%
- Atypical MEG inter-subject correlation during listening to continuous natural speech in dyslexia 95%
- Early beta oscillations in multisensory association areas underlie crossmodal performance enhancement 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Dynamic signatures of the Eureka effect: An EEG study 95%
- When inefficient speech-motor control affects speech comprehension: atypical electrophysiological correlates of language prediction in stuttering 94%
- EEG-based speaker-listener neural coupling reflects speech-selective attentional mechanisms beyond the speech stimulus 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Neural signatures of stream segregation: From childhood to adulthood 95%
- EEG and behavioral correlates of attentional processing while walking and navigating naturalistic environments 95%
- Disentangling the Functional Roles of Pre-Stimulus Oscillations in Crossmodal Associative Memory Formation via Sensory Entrainment 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.