Back

The plasma degradome reflects later development of NASH fibrosis after liver transplant

Li, J.; Sato, T.; Hernandez-Tejero, M.; Beier, J. I.; Sayed, K.; Benos, P. V.; Wilkey, D. W.; Humar, A.; Merchant, M. L.; Duarte-Rojo, A.; Arteel, G. E.

2023-02-01 pathology
10.1101/2023.01.30.526241 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Although liver transplantation (LT) is an effective therapy for cirrhosis, the risk of post-LT NASH is alarmingly high and is associated with accelerated progression to fibrosis/cirrhosis, cardiovascular disease, and decreased survival. Lack of risk stratification strategies hamper liver undergoes significant remodeling during inflammatory injury. During such remodeling, degraded peptide fragments (i.e., degradome) of the ECM and other proteins increase in plasma, making it a useful diagnostic/prognostic tool in chronic liver disease. To investigate whether inflammatory liver injury caused by post-LT NASH would yield a unique degradome profile, predictive of severe post-LT NASH fibrosis, we performed a retrospective analysis of 22 biobanked samples from the Starzl Transplantation Institute (12 with post-LT NASH after 5 years and 10 without). Total plasma peptides were isolated and analyzed by 1D-LC-MS/MS analysis using a Proxeon EASY-nLC 1000 UHPLC and nanoelectrospray ionization into an Orbitrap Elite mass spectrometer. Qualitative and quantitative peptide features data were developed from MSn datasets using PEAKS Studio X (v10). LC-MS/MS yielded [~]2700 identifiable peptide features based on the results from Peaks Studio analysis. Several peptides were significantly altered in patients that later developed fibrosis and heatmap analysis of the top 25 most significantly-changed peptides, most of which were ECM-derived, clustered the 2 patient groups well. Supervised modeling of the dataset indicated that a fraction of the total peptide signal ([~]15%) could explain the differences between the groups, indicating a strong potential for representative biomarker selection. A similar degradome profile was observed when the plasma degradome patterns were compared being obesity sensitive (C57Bl6/J) and insensitive (AJ) mouse strains. Both The plasma degradome profile of post-LT patients yields stark difference based on later development of post-LT NASH fibrosis. This approach could yield new "fingerprints" that can serve as minimally-invasive biomarkers of negative outcomes post-LT.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
2
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.4%
3
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.6%
4
The American Journal of Pathology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
5
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.7%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.2%
7
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.8%
8
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.7%
10
Journal of Proteomics
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.9%
12
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.8%
13
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.3%
14
Free Radical Biology and Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
15
Theranostics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
16
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
17
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
18
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
19
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
Cell Discovery
54 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
22
Metabolomics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
23
Hepatology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
25
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.7%
26
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
27
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
BMC Microbiology
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%