Back

Study Protocol for the Pilot Evaluation for SMartphone-adaptable Artificial Intelligence for PRediction and DeTection of Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (The SMART-LV Pilot Study Protocol)

Dhingra, L. S.; Aminorroaya, A.; Sangha, V.; Khunte, A.; Oikonomou, E. K.; Mortazavi, B. J.; McNamara, R.; Herrin, J.; Wilson, F. P.; Krumholz, H.; Khera, R.

2023-01-31 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2023.01.30.23285120 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionDespite a prevalence of 3-5% among adults, asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) remains underdiagnosed. There is a critical need for an accurate and widely accessible screening strategy for LVSD, given its association with preventable morbidity and premature mortality. A novel deep learning approach has demonstrated the ability to detect LVSD directly from ECG images, with retrospective validation across multiple institutions. There is a lack of prospective validation. In this pilot study, we evaluate the feasibility of screening and recruiting individuals for prospective echocardiography based on an image-based artificial intelligence (AI)-ECG algorithm applied to the ECG repository at a large academic medical center. Research Methods and AnalysisThis is the protocol for a prospective cohort study in outpatient primary care clinics of the Yale New Haven Hospital (YNHH). Adult patients who have undergone a 12-lead ECG without subsequent echocardiogram as a part of routine clinical care within 90 days of the ECG will be identified in the electronic health record (EHR). The AI-ECG model for LVSD will be deployed to YNHH ECG repository to define the probability of LVSD, identifying 5 patients each with high and low probability of LVSD. After discussion with primary care physicians, and subsequent contact by the study team, screened participants will be invited for and undergo an echocardiogram. The study participants and the cardiologists conducting the echocardiograms will be blinded to the results of the AI-ECG screen. The analysis will focus on feasibility metrics: the proportion (i) of all patients undergoing ECGs who have high probability of LVSD without subsequent echocardiogram, (ii) of patients who agree to participate in the study, and (iii) that undergo an echocardiogram. A descriptive exploration of the comparison of the AI-ECG and echocardiogram results will also be reported. Ethics and DisseminationAll patient EHR data required for assessing eligibility and conducting the AI-ECG screening will be accessed through secure servers approved for protected health information. Potential participants will only be contacted after they have discussed the study information with their primary care physician. All participants will be required to provide written informed consent before participation and data will be deidentified prior to analysis. This study protocol has been approved by the Yale Institutional Review Board (Protocol Number: 2000034006) and has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT05630170). The results of the future validation study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and summaries will be provided to the study participants.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.1%
2
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.7%
3
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.3%
4
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.1%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.1%
7
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
8
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.7%
9
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
10
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
11
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
12
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%
15
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
16
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
17
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
18
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
19
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 80%
0.5%
20
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
21
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%
22
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%