Back

Foveolar cone subtype patterning in human retinal organoids

Hussey, K.; Eldred, K.; Reh, T. A.; Johnston, R. J.

2023-01-29 developmental biology
10.1101/2023.01.28.526051 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The mechanisms that generate patterns of cell types unique to humans are poorly understood. In the central region of the human retina, the high-acuity foveola is notable, in part, for its dense packing of green (M) and red (L) cones and absence of blue (S) cones. To identify mechanisms that promote M/L and suppress S cone patterning in the foveola, we examined human fetal retinas and differentiated human retinal organoids. During development, sparse S-opsin-expressing cones are initially observed in the foveola. Later in fetal development, the foveola contains a mix of cones that either co-express S- and M/L-opsins or exclusively express M/L-opsin. In adults, only M/L cones are present. Two signaling pathway regulators are highly and continuously expressed in the central retina: Cytochrome P450 26 subfamily A member 1 (CYP26A1), which degrades retinoic acid (RA) and Deiodinase 2 (DIO2), which promotes thyroid hormone (TH) signaling. Both CYP26A1 null mutant organoids and high RA conditions increased the number of S cones and reduced the number of M/L cones in human retinal organoids. In contrast, sustained TH signaling promoted the generation of M/L-opsin-expressing cones and induced M/L-opsin expression in S-opsin-expressing cones, showing that cone fate is plastic. Our data suggest that CYP26A1 degrades RA to specify M/L cones and limit S cones and that continuous DIO2 expression sustains high levels of TH to convert S cones into M/L cones, resulting in the foveola containing only M/L cones. Since the foveola is highly susceptible to impairment in diseases such as macular degeneration, a leading cause of vision loss, our findings inform organoid design for potential therapeutic applications.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.