Nesting flight statistics for wind turbine planning: a MoveApps workflow
Koelzsch, A.; Gal, J.
Show abstract
As green, renewable energy is increasing by the installation of more and more wind turbines, the assessment of their impact on protected species has to be improved by more automatized, data-driven risk analyses. We have developed as set of two workflows to extract simple parameters for collision risk models from GPS tracks of sensitive bird species during nesting. The workflows have been integrated into the free MoveApps platform and are available there. The analysis code of all components of the workflows is openly available on GitHub, and improvement and adaption to other, similar requirements is encouraged. With three example data sets of white storks (WS), red kites (RK) and marsh harriers (MH), we illustrate how the workflows are used. The first workflow identifies nesting sites and time of nesting from the GPS tracks, the second workflow calculates flight speeds, flight duration, flight height and distance from the nest. Estimated flight speeds show low within species variability, with averages of 4.1 m/s (MH), 6.9 m/s (RK) and 10.9 m/s (WS). Extracted times of nesting are widely spread through the season and flight height and distance to the nest when in flight show large differences between individuals and years. Similar to the central evaluation distances around the nest required by national legislation, the 50% in-flight usage thresholds are 700 m (MH), 1100 m (RK) and 1400 m (WS). Flight height during nesting is rather low, on average 16 m (MH), 75 m (RK) and 193 m (WS) above the ground. These values can help to estimate collision risk with wind turbines for large birds in Central Europe during their nesting period. Finally, the developed MoveApps workflows (an possible adaptions) can be used to extract required parameters from tracking studies of any other vulnerable species or populations in an unbiased, automated manner to improve wind turbine placement in relation to nesting sites.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Real-time alerts from AI-enabled camera traps using the Iridium satellite network: a case-study in Gabon, Central Africa 94%
- movedesign: Shiny R app to evaluate sampling design for animal tracking movement studies 94%
- A relative-motion method for parsing spatio-temporal behaviour of dyads using GPS relocation data 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrating biodiversity assessments into local conservation planning: the importance of assessing suitable data sources 94%
- Spatio-temporal dynamics of attacks around deaths of wolves: A statistical assessment of lethal control efficiency in France 94%
- Modelling Eurasian lynx populations in Western Europe: What prospects for the next 50 years? 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine learning goes wild: Using data from captive individuals to infer wildlife behaviour 93%
- SecSel, a new software tool for conservation prioritization that is applicable to ordinal-scale data for multiple biodiversity features 93%
- Do atmospheric events explain the arrival of an invasive ladybird (Harmonia axyridis) in the UK? 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Monitoring free-living honeybee colonies in Germany: Insights into habitat preferences, survival rates, and Citizen Science reliability 93%
- How citizen science could improve Species Distribution Models and their independent assessment 93%
- Increased microclimatic variation in artificial nests does not create ecological traps for a secondary cavity breeder 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.