Barriers and opportunities relating to the implementation and evaluation of a complex digital intervention in England: A case study of Greater Manchester Diabetes My Way
Goldthorpe, J.; Allen, T.; Rutter, M.; Brooks, J.
Show abstract
IntroductionDigital diabetes management systems have the potential to deliver cost-effective, flexible self-management support to patients with type 2 diabetes. DiabetesMyWay (DMW) is a platform for an open access website that aims to support diabetes self-management and provide patients with access to their care records. We present a case study focusing on a project involving patients across the large urban area of Greater Manchester (GM). MethodsInterviews were undertaken with 8 members of the project team and 3 patients using the platform. Data were analysed thematically using the template analysis approach. ResultsThree themes are presented: Complex approvals, permissions and access across multiple organisations and systems; Capacity challenges in primary care settings; Ongoing support for the project. Implementation and evaluation of GMDMW involved navigating data sharing systems and regulations for complex private and public sector organisations and these impacted on the electronic data sharing necessary for the DMW platform to work as intended. Participants felt that the complexities associated with merging different systems, operated by different organisations, with different data controllers and data owners were greater than anticipated. DiscussionThe complexity, number of organisations and levels of governance involved in implementing and evaluating GMDMW were barriers to implementation and evaluation. This reflects inherent problems around mobilising innovation in the NHS. Our findings can help the development and evaluation electronic interventions to improve health to navigate this complex research landscape and ensure that patients can access the most innovative and effective ways to support their health. (245/250 words) Author summaryDigital health interventions and Public Private Partnerships for innovation in the NHS are on the rise and in order to establish efficacy, these need to be evaluated. Often, this research and evaluation is carried out by Universities. However, challenges around navigating governance across these complex, multiple organisations exist where there is a need to share data and collaborate across systems effectively. Here, we describe the many unexpected challenges and solutions to effective data sharing reported by professionals and patients involved in the delivery and evaluation of a UK-based NHS/ private sector collaboration to provide a digital platform to support self-management of diabetes.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A mixed-methods evaluation of patients’ views on primary care multi-disciplinary teams in Scotland 94%
- Integrating primary care and social services for older adults with multimorbidity: A qualitative study 94%
- Teleconferencing as an alternative to written Advice and Guidance referrals at the primary-secondary care interface: a qualitative case study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 96%
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 93%
- Mothers’ experiences of using Facebook groups for local breastfeeding support: results of an online survey exploring midwife moderation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Physician experiences of electronic health records interoperability and its practical impact on care delivery in the English NHS: A cross-sectional survey study 94%
- Determining the feasibility of calculating pancreatic cancer risk scores for people with new-onset diabetes in primary care (DEFEND PRIME): study protocol 93%
- Adverse event reviews in healthcare: What matters to patients and their family? A qualitative study exploring the perspective of patients and family 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation of predictive risk stratification to reduce emergency admissions to hospital: experiences of general practitioners and practice managers 96%
- OpenSAFELY NHS Service Restoration Observatory 1: describing trends and variation in primary care clinical activity for 23.3 million patients in England during the first wave of COVID-19 94%
- Impact of COVID-19 on Migrants’ Access to Primary Care: A National Qualitative Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Nurses’ experience of using video consultation in a digital care setting and its impact on their workflow and communication 94%
- The challenges of replication: a worked example of methods reproducibility using routinely collected healthcare data 94%
- “The impact of the Little Orange Book on how parents/carers manage symptoms of illness in children: A mixed methods study” 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.