Back

A computational model of chemically and mechanically induced platelet plug formation

Cardillo, G.; Barakat, A. I.

2023-01-27 bioengineering
10.1101/2023.01.26.525741 bioRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesThrombotic deposition is a major consideration in the development of implantable cardiovascular devices. Recently, it has been experimentally demonstrated that localized changes in the blood shear rate -i.e. shear gradients-play a critical role in thrombogenesis. The goal of the present work is to develop a predictive computational model of platelet plug formation that can be used to assess the thrombotic burden of cardiovascular devices, introducing for the first time the role of shear gradients. We have developed a comprehensive model of platelet-mediated thrombogenesis which includes platelet transport in the blood flow, platelet activation and aggregation induced by both biochemical and mechanical factors, kinetics and mechanics of platelet adhesion, and changes in the local fluid dynamics due to the thrombus growth. MethodsA 2D computational model was developed using the multi-physics finite element solver COMSOL 5.6. The model can be described by a coupled set of convection-diffusion-reaction equations. Platelet adhesion at the surface was modeled via flux boundary conditions. Using a moving mesh for the surface, thrombus growth and consequent alterations in blood flow were modeled. In the case of a stenosis, the notions of shear stress induced platelet activation in the contraction zone and shear gradients induced platelet deposition in the expansion zone downstream of the stenosis were studied. ResultsThe model provides the spatial and temporal evolution of platelet plug in the flow field. The computed platelet plug size evolution was validated against literature data. The results confirm the importance of considering both mechanical and chemical aggregation of platelets. ConclusionsThe developed model represents a potentially useful tool for the optimization of the design of the cardiovascular device flow path.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.9%
2
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.0%
3
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.1%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.7%
6
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.7%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.9%
8
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
9
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
10
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 52%
2.0%
12
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
15
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
16
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
17
Physics of Fluids
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
18
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
19
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
21
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%