Back

Signatures of pubertal brain development and health revealed through domain adapted brain network fusion

Kraft, D.; Alnaes, D.; Kaufmann, T.

2023-01-31 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2023.01.26.23285055 medRxiv
Show abstract

Puberty demarks a period of profound brain dynamics that orchestrates changes to a multitude of neuroimaging-derived phenotypes. This poses a dimensionality problem when attempting to chart an individuals brain development on a single scale. Here, we illustrate shifts in subject similarity of imaging data that relate to pubertal maturation and altered mental health, suggesting that dimensional reference spaces of subject similarity render useful to chart brain dynamics in youths.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Mental Health
○ 21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.2%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Molecular Psychiatry
○ 282 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.6%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.2%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Translational Psychiatry
○ 260 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.5%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
5
Human Brain Mapping
○ 329 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.4%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.2%
7
Science Advances
● 1243 papers in training set
Top 14%
2.6%
8
Communications Biology
○ 993 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.6%
9
Nature Medicine
○ 125 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
10
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.4%
11
Biological Psychiatry
○ 137 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
12
NeuroImage
○ 903 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
13
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
○ 11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
14
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
○ 71 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
15
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
○ 96 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.7%
17
Nature Neuroscience
○ 252 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
18
Nature Genetics
○ 286 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
Communications Psychology
○ 22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
20
Communications Medicine
○ 113 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Psychiatry
○ 87 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Nature Protocols
○ 33 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
23
Nature
○ 645 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
24
BMC Medicine
○ 176 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
25
Scientific Data
○ 209 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
26
Nature Human Behaviour
○ 95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.