Back

Label-Free Mammalian Cell Tracking Enhanced by Precomputed Velocity Fields

Han, Y.; Yang, L.; Shkolnikov, V.; Xin, D.; Barcelo, S.; Allebach, J.; Delp, E.

2023-01-26 cell biology
10.1101/2023.01.25.525598 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Label-free cell imaging, where the cell is not "labeled" or modified by fluorescent chemicals, is an important research area in the field of biology. It avoids altering the cells properties which typically happens in the process of chemical labeling. However, without the contrast enhancement from the label, the analysis of label-free imaging is more challenging than label-based imaging. In addition, it provides few human interpretable features, and thus needs machine learning approaches to help with the identification and tracking of specific cells. We are interested in label-free phase contrast imaging to track cells flowing in a cell sorting device where images are acquired at 500 frames/s. Existing Multiple Object Tracking (MOT) methods face four major challenges when used for tracking cells in a microfluidic sorting device: (i) most of the cells have large displacements between frames without any overlap; (ii) it is difficult to distinguish between cells as they are visually similar to each other; (iii) the velocities of cells vary with the location in the device; (iv) the appearance of cells may change as they move in and out of the focal plane of the imaging sensor that observes the isolation process. In this paper, we introduce a method for tracking cells in a predefined flow in the sorting device via phase contrast microscopy. Our proposed method is based on DeepSORT and YOLOv4 and exploits prior knowledge of a cells velocity to assist tracking. We modify the Kalman filter in DeepSORT to accommodate a non-constant velocity motion model and integrate a representative velocity field obtained from fluid dynamics into the Kalman filter. The experimental results show that our proposed method outperforms several MOT methods for tracking cells in the sorting device.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.