Multi-region brain transcriptomes uncover two subtypes of aging individuals with differences in Alzheimer risk and the impact of APOEe4
Lee, A. J.; Ma, Y.; Yu, L.; Dawe, R. J.; McCabe, C.; Arfanakis, K.; Mayeux, R.; Bennett, D. A.; Klein, H.-U.; De Jager, P.
Show abstract
The heterogeneity of the older population suggests the existence of subsets of individuals which share certain brain molecular features and respond differently to risk factors for Alzheimers disease, but this population structure remains poorly defined. Here, we performed an unsupervised clustering of individuals with multi-region brain transcriptomes to assess whether a broader approach, simultaneously considering data from multiple regions involved in cognition would uncover such subsets. We implemented a canonical correlation-based analysis in a Discovery cohort of 459 participants from two longitudinal studies of cognitive aging that have RNA sequence profiles in three brain regions. 690 additional participants that have data in only one or two of these regions were used in the Replication effort. These clustering analyses identified two meta-clusters, MC-1 and MC-2. The two sets of participants differ primarily in their trajectories of cognitive decline, with MC-2 having a delay of 3 years to the median age of incident dementia. This is due, in part, to a greater impact of tau pathology on neuronal chromatin architecture and to broader brain changes including greater loss of white matter integrity in MC-1. Further evidence of biological differences includes a significantly larger impact of APOE{varepsilon}4 risk on cognitive decline in MC-1. These findings suggest that our proposed population structure captures an aspect of the more distributed molecular state of the aging brain that either enhances the effect of risk factors in MC-1 or of protective effects in MC-2. These observations may inform the design of therapeutic development efforts and of trials as both become increasingly more targeted molecularly. One Sentence Summary: There are two types of aging brains, with one being more vulnerable to APOE{varepsilon}4 and subsequent neuronal dysfunction and cognitive loss.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Individual bioenergetic capacity as a potential source of resilience to Alzheimer’s disease 96%
- Cell-type-specific Alzheimer’s disease polygenic risk scores are associated with distinct disease processes in Alzheimer’s disease 96%
- A public resource of single cell transcriptomes and multiscale networks from persons with and without Alzheimer's disease 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Psychosocial experiences are associated with human brain mitochondrial biology 96%
- ACSS2 upregulation enhances neuronal resilience to aging and tau-associated neurodegeneration 95%
- Amyloid-β and tau pathologies relate to distinctive brain dysconnectomics in preclinical autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.