Back

Wearable technology to capture arm use of stroke survivors in home and community settings: feasibility and insights on motor performance

Demers, M.; Bishop, L.; Cain, A.; Saba, J.; Rowe, J.; Zondervan, D.; Winstein, C.

2023-01-28 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.1101/2023.01.25.23284790 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo establish short-term feasibility and usability of wrist-worn wearable sensors to capture arm/hand activity of stroke survivors and to explore the association between factors related to use of the paretic arm/hand. Methods30 chronic stroke survivors were monitored with wrist-worn wearable sensors during 12h/day for a 7-day period. Participants also completed standardized assessments to capture stroke severity, arm motor impairments, self-perceived arm use and self-efficacy. Usability of the wearable sensors was assessed using the adapted System Usability Scale and an exit interview. Associations between motor performance and capacity (arm/hand impairments and activity limitations) were assessed using Spearmans correlations. ResultsMinimal technical issues or lack of adherence to the wearing schedule occurred, with 87.6% of days procuring valid data from both sensors. Average sensor wear time was 12.6 (standard deviation: 0.2) h/day. Three participants experienced discomfort with one of the wristbands and three other participants had unrelated adverse events. There were positive self-reported usability scores (mean: 85.4/100) and high user satisfaction. Significant correlations were observed for measures of motor capacity and self-efficacy with paretic arm use in the home and the community (Spearmans correlation {rho}s: 0.44-0.71). ConclusionsThis work demonstrates the feasibility and usability of a consumer-grade wearable sensor to capture paretic arm activity outside the laboratory. It provides early insight into stroke survivors everyday arm use and related factors such as motor capacity and self-efficacy. ImpactThe integration of wearable technologies into clinical practice offers new possibilities to complement in-person clinical assessments and to better understand how each person is moving outside of therapy and throughout the recovery and reintegration phase. Insights gained from monitoring stroke survivors arm/hand use in the home and community is the first step towards informing future research with an emphasis on causal mechanisms with clinical relevance.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.0%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.2%
3
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.2%
7
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
8
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
9
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
10
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
12
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.5%
13
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Gait & Posture
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
16
MethodsX
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
17
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
18
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
21
Age and Ageing
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
23
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%