Back

The sound of restored soil: Measuring soil biodiversity in a forest restoration chronosequence with ecoacoustics

Robinson, J. M.; Breed, M.; Abrahams, C.

2023-01-23 ecology
10.1101/2023.01.23.525240 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Forest restoration requires monitoring to assess changes in above- and below-ground communities, which is challenging due to practical and resource limitations. With emerging sound recording technologies, ecological acoustic survey methods--also known as ecoacoustics--are increasingly available. These provide a rapid, effective, and non-intrusive means of monitoring biodiversity. Above-ground ecoacoustics is increasingly widespread, but soil ecoacoustics has yet to be utilised in restoration despite its demonstrable effectiveness at detecting meso- and macrofauna acoustic signals. This study applied ecoacoustic tools and indices (Acoustic Complexity Index, Normalised Difference Soundscape Index, and Bioacoustic Index) to measure above- and below-ground biodiversity in a forest restoration chronosequence. We hypothesised that higher acoustic complexity, diversity and high-frequency to low-frequency ratio would be detected in restored forest plots. We collected n = 198 below-ground samples and n = 180 ambient and controlled samples from three recently degraded (within 10 years) and three restored (30-51 years ago) deciduous forest plots across three monthly visits. We used passive acoustic monitoring to record above-ground biological sounds and a below-ground sampling device and sound-attenuation chamber to record soil communities. We found that restored plot acoustic complexity and diversity were higher in the sound-attenuation chamber soil but not in situ or above-ground samples. Moreover, we found that restored plots had a significantly greater high-frequency to low-frequency ratio for soil, but no such association for above-ground samples. Our results suggest that ecoacoustics has the potential to monitor below-ground biodiversity, adding to the restoration ecologists toolkit and supporting global ecosystem recovery. Implications for PracticeO_LIThis is the first known study to assess the sounds of soil biodiversity in a forest restoration context, paving the way for more comprehensive studies and practical applications to support global ecosystem recovery. C_LIO_LISoil ecoacoustics has the potential to support restoration ecology/biodiversity assessments, providing a minimally intrusive, cost-effective and rapid surveying tool. The methods are also relatively simple to learn and apply. C_LIO_LIEcoacoustics can contribute toward overcoming the profound challenge of quantifying the effectiveness (i.e., success) of forest restoration interventions in reinstating target species, functions and so-called services and reducing disturbance. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.2%
2
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.2%
3
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
6
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.5%
8
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
9
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
10
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
11
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
12
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
16
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
17
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
18
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
19
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
20
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.6%