Protocol for mapping of the supplementary motor area using repetitive navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation
Engelhardt, M. J.; Kern, G.; Karhu, J.; Picht, T.
Show abstract
Structured abstractO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSDamage to the supplementary motor area (SMA) for example during surgery can lead to impairments of motor and language function. A detailed preoperative mapping of functional boarders of the SMA could therefore aid preoperative diagnostics in these patients. ObjectiveThe aim of this study was the development of a repetitive nTMS protocol for non-invasive functional mapping of the SMA while assuring effects are indeed caused by SMA stimulation rather than activation of M1. MethodsTo this purpose the SMA in the dominant hemisphere of twelve healthy subjects (28.2 {+/-} 7.7 years, 6 females) was mapped using repetitive nTMS at 20 Hz (120% RMT), while subjects performed a finger tapping task. The location of induced errors was marked in each subjects individual MRI. To further validate the protocol, effects of SMA stimulation were directly compared to effects of M1 stimulation in four different tasks. ResultsMapping of the SMA was possible for all subjects, yet varying effect sizes were observed. Stimulation of the SMA led to a significant reduction of finger taps compared to baseline (BL: 45 taps, SMA: 35.5 taps; p < 0.01). Line tracing, writing and targeting of circles was less accurate during SMA compared to M1 stimulation. ConclusionMapping of the SMA using repetitive nTMS is feasible. While errors induced in the SMA are not entirely independent of M1 due to the proximity of both regions, disruption of the SMA induces functionally distinct errors. These error maps can aid preoperative diagnostics in patients with SMA related lesions.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Does pericentral mu-rhythm power corticomotor excitability? A matter of EEG perspective 96%
- Hemodynamic changes in response to excitatory and inhibitory modulations by transcranial magnetic stimulation at the human sensorimotor cortex 95%
- TMS target comparison identifies motor network reorganization associated with behavioral improvement in writer’s cramp dystonia: A randomized, double-blind, Sham-controlled clinical trial 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Tactile versus Motor Imagery: Differences in Corticospinal Excitability Assessed with single-pulse TMS 95%
- Short periods of bipolar anodal TDCS induce no instantaneous dose-dependent increase in cerebral blood flow in the targeted human motor cortex 95%
- Sensory and motor electrophysiological mapping of the cerebellum in humans. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts neuroplasticity of intracortical motor circuits. 95%
- Anodal M1 tDCS enhances online learning of rhythmic timing videogame skill 94%
- Vibrotactile auricular vagus nerve stimulation alters limbic system connectivity in humans: A pilot study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated optimization of deep brain stimulation parameters for modulating neuroimaging-based targets 94%
- Enhanced selectivity of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation by multielectrode configuration 94%
- TAP: Targeting and analysis pipeline for optimization and verification of coil placement in transcranial magnetic stimulation 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Utilising TMS-EEG to assess the response to cerebellar-brain inhibition 96%
- Cerebellar tDCS alters the perception of optic flow 96%
- Investigation of neuromodulatory effect of anodal cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on the primary motor cortex using functional near-infrared spectroscopy 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.