Germline pathogenic variants in 786 neuroblastoma patients
Kim, J.; Vaksman, Z.; Egolf, L. E.; Kaufman, R.; Evans, J. P.; Conkrite, K. L.; Danesh, A.; Lopez, G.; Randall, M. P.; Dent, M. H.; Farra, L. M.; Menghani, N.; Dymek, M.; Desai, H.; Hausler, R.; Penn Medicine Biobank, ; Regeneron Genetics Center, ; Cancer Genomics Research Laboratory, ; Guidry Auvil, J.; Gerhard, D. S.; Hakonarson, H.; Maxwell, K. N.; Cole, K. A.; Pugh, T.; Bosse, K. R.; Khan, J.; Wei, J. S.; Maris, J. M.; Stewart, D. R.; Diskin, S. J.
Show abstract
ImportanceNeuroblastoma accounts for 12% of childhood cancer deaths. The genetic contribution of rare pathogenic germline variation in patients without a family history remains unclear. ObjectiveTo define the prevalence, spectrum, and clinical significance of pathogenic germline variation in cancer predisposition genes (CPGs) in neuroblastoma patients. Design, Setting and ParticipantsGermline DNA sequencing was performed on the peripheral blood from 786 neuroblastoma patients unselected for family history. Rare variants mapping to CPGs were evaluated for pathogenicity and the percentage of cases harboring pathogenic (P) or likely pathogenic (LP) variants was quantified. The frequency of CPG P-LP variants in neuroblastoma cases was compared to two distinct cancer-free control cohorts to assess enrichment. Matched tumor DNA sequencing was evaluated for "second hits" at CPGs and germline DNA array data from 5,585 neuroblastoma cases and 23,505 cancer-free control children was analyzed to identify rare germline copy number variants (CNVs) affecting genes with an excess burden of P-LP variants in neuroblastoma. Neuroblastoma patients with germline P-LP variants were compared to those without P-LP variants to test for association with clinical characteristics, tumor features, and patient survival. Main Outcomes and MeasuresRare variant prevalence, pathogenicity, enrichment, and association with clinical characteristics, tumor features, and patient survival. ResultsWe observed 116 P-LP variants in CPGs involving 13.9% (109/786) of patients, representing a significant excess burden of P-LP variants compared to controls (9.1%; P = 5.14 x 10-5, Odds Ratio: 1.60, 95% confidence interval: 1.27-2.00). BARD1 harbored the most significant burden of P-LP variants compared to controls (1.0% vs. 0.03%; P = 8.18 x 10-7; Odds Ratio: 32.30, 95% confidence interval: 6.44-310.35). Rare germline CNVs disrupting BARD1 were also identified in neuroblastoma patients (0.05%) but absent in controls (P = 7.08 x 10-3; Odds Ratio: 29.47, 95% confidence interval: 1.52 - 570.70). Overall, P-LP variants in DNA repair genes in this study were enriched in cases compared to controls (8.1% vs. 5.7%; P = 0.01; Odds Ratio: 1.45, 95% confidence interval: 1.08-1.92). Neuroblastoma patients harboring a germline P-LP variant had a worse overall survival when compared to patients without P-LP variants (P = 8.6 x 10-3), and this remained significant in a multivariate Cox proportional-hazards model (P = 0.01). Conclusions and RelevanceNeuroblastoma patients harboring germline P-LP variants in CPGs have worse overall survival and BARD1 is an important predisposition gene affected by both common and rare pathogenic variation. Germline sequencing should be performed for all neuroblastoma patients at diagnosis to inform genetic counseling and support future longitudinal and mechanistic studies. Patients with a germline P-LP variant should be closely monitored, regardless of risk group assignment. Key Points QuestionWhat is the prevalence and clinical significance of germline pathogenic variants in cancer predisposition genes (CPGs) in neuroblastoma patients? FindingsAmong 786 neuroblastoma patients with germline DNA sequencing, 13.9% harbored a pathogenic (P) or likely pathogenic (LP) variant in a CPG. The number of patients with germline P-LP variants in BARD1 and other DNA repair genes was significantly greater than observed in two cancer-free control cohorts. The presence of a germline P-LP variant was independently predictive of worse overall survival. MeaningGermline sequencing should be performed for all neuroblastoma patients at diagnosis to inform genetic counseling and frequency of clinical follow-up. Centralization of these data will facilitate longitudinal and mechanistic studies needed to identify specific actionable events and improve patient outcomes.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Lineage-dependence of the neuroblastoma surfaceome defines tumor cell state-dependent and independent immunotherapeutic targets 95%
- Transcriptomic landscape identifies two unrecognized ependymoma subtypes and novel pathways in medulloblastoma 93%
- The impact of germline variants in DNA repair pathways on survival and temozolomide toxicity in adults with glioma 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Germline predisposition to pediatric Ewing sarcoma is uniquely characterized by inherited pathogenic variants in DNA damage repair genes 94%
- The immunogenetics of viral antigen response is associated with sub-type specific glioma risk and survival 92%
- Dystonia-specific mutations in THAP1 alter transcription of genes associated with neurodevelopment and myelin 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- IGenomic answers for children: Dynamic analyses of >1000 pediatric rare disease genomes 91%
- Poison exon annotations improve the yield of clinically relevant variants in genomic diagnostic testing 91%
- Rare variants found in clinical gene panels illuminate the genetic and allelic architecture of orofacial clefting 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification and validation of novel candidate risk genes in endocytic vesicular trafficking associated with esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistulas 91%
- Long-read genome sequencing for the diagnosis of neurodevelopmental disorders 90%
- Functional characterization of pathogenic SATB2 missense variants identifies distinct effects on chromatin binding and transcriptional activity 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.