COVID-19 and Mental Health in China: Effects of Personality and Demographics
Zhang, X.; Battisti, M.; Proto, E.
Show abstract
China was the first country affected by the COVID-19 virus and it reacted strongly in the first months of 2020. This paper presents new evidence on the deterioration in mental health in China between 2018 and 2020. Using two waves of the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) we can follow the same individuals pre and during the pandemic periods. We find clear evidence of a moderate level of mental health deterioration between 2018 and 2020. The prevalence of severe cases of depression, measured using an eight-item version of the common CES-D scale, increased from 6.33% in 2018 to 7.54% in 2020; quantifiable as around a 19% increase. This deterioration is higher for individuals who are subject to strict lockdowns, about 0.3 symptoms more on average, and it is stronger among those who already reported symptoms of depression in the 2018 wave of data. The effects we find are larger for individuals with more open personalities: one standard deviation of the Openness trait corresponds to 0.08 more symptoms, while more Neurotic individuals do not seem to be more affected. Younger cohorts and individuals with lower levels of education are more affected. Males seem slightly more affected than females, although this difference is statistically non-significant.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The prevalence, incidence and risk factors of mental health problems and mental health services use before and 9 months after the COVID-19 outbreak among the general Dutch population. A 3-wave prospective study 94%
- Differential associations between SARS-CoV-2 infection, perceived burden of the pandemic and mental health in the German population-based cohort for digital health research 94%
- An overview of current mental health in the general population of Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results from the COLLATE project 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Frequency of Depressive Symptoms and Suicidal Ideation Among University Students Before and After the COVID-19 Pandemic 93%
- Closed Doors: Predictors of Stress, Anxiety, Depression, and PTSD During the Onset of COVID-19 Pandemic in Brazil 92%
- Association among income loss, financial strain and depressive symptoms during COVID-19: evidence from two longitudinal studies 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Anxiety and Depression among Medical Doctors in Catalonia, Italy, and the UK during the COVID-19 Pandemic 93%
- Impact of COVID-19-lockdown and vulnerability factors on cognitive functioning and mental health in Italian population 93%
- Mental health and burnout during medical school: Longitudinal evolution and covariates 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on anxiety and depression symptoms of young people in the Global South: evidence from a four-country cohort study 94%
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on diagnoses of common mental health disorders in adults in Catalonia, Spain 92%
- “When will this end? Will it end?” The impact of the March-June 2020 UK Covid-19 lockdown response on mental health: a longitudinal survey of mothers in the Born in Bradford study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Time trends of mental health indicators in Germany’s adult population before and during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- Predicting Managers' Mental Health Across Countries Using Country-Level COVID-19 Statistics 93%
- Increasing trends in mental health problems among Chinese young adolescents: results from repeated cross-sectional data in Changsha 2016-2020 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.