CONSTANS alters the circadian clock in Arabidopsis thaliana
de los Reyes, P.; Romero-Campero, F. J.; Gao, H.; Serrano-Bueno, G.; Romero, J. M.; Valverde, F.
Show abstract
AbstractPlants are sessile organisms that have acquired highly plastic developmental strategies to adapt to the environment. Among these processes, the floral transition is essential to ensure reproductive success and is finely regulated by several internal and external genetic networks. The photoperiodic pathway, which controls the plant response to day length, is one of the most important pathways controlling flowering. In Arabidopsis photoperiodic flowering, CONSTANS (CO) is the central gene activating the expression of the florigen FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) in the leaves at the end of a long day. CO expression is strongly regulated by the circadian clock. However, to date, no evidence has been reported regarding a feedback loop from the photoperiod pathway back to the circadian clock. Using transcriptional networks, we have identified relevant network motifs regulating the interplay between the circadian clock and the photoperiod pathway. Gene expression, chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments and phenotypic analysis allowed us to elucidate the role of CO over the circadian clock. Plants with altered CO expression showed a different internal clock period, measured by daily rhythmic movements in the leaves. We show that CO is able to activate key genes related to the circadian clock, such as CCA1, LHY, PRR5 and GI, at the end of a long day by binding to specific sites on their promoters. Moreover, a significant number of PRR5 repressed target genes are upregulated by CO, and this could explain the phase transition promoted by CO. The CO-PRR5 complex interacts with the bZIP transcription factor HY5 and helps to localize the complex in the promoters of clock genes. Our results indicate that there may be a feedback loop in which CO communicates back to the circadian clock, feeding seasonal information to the circadian system.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- DET1-mediated COP1 regulation avoids HY5 activity over second-site targets to tune plant photomorphogenesis 96%
- Manipulation of Photosensory and Circadian Signalling Restricts Developmental Plasticity in Arabidopsis 95%
- The lncRNA APOLO interacts with the transcription factor WRKY42 to trigger root hair cell expansion in response to cold 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transcriptomic dynamics of petal development in the one-day flower species, Japanese morning glory (Ipomoea nil) 94%
- Auxin-responsive (phospho)proteome analysis reveals regulation of cell cycle and ethylene signaling during rice crown root development 94%
- Comparing hormone dynamics in cereal crops via transient expression of hormone sensors 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- AGL16 regulates genome-wide gene expression and flowering time with partial dependency on SOC1 in Arabidopsis 96%
- Differential effects of day-night cues and the circadian clock on the barley transcriptome 95%
- A network of RS splicing regulatory proteins controls light-dependent splicing and seedling development 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Changes in ambient temperature are the prevailing cue in determining Brachypodium distachyon diurnal gene regulation 96%
- Field microenvironments regulate crop diel transcript and metabolite rhythms 96%
- A Phosphorus-Limitation Induced, Functionally Conserved DUF506 Protein is a Repressor of Root Hair Elongation in Arabidopsis thaliana 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Systematic histone H4 replacement in Arabidopsis thaliana reveals a role for H4R17 in regulating flowering time 96%
- The PIF1-MIR408-Plantacyanin Repression Cascade Regulates Light Dependent Seed Germination 95%
- The U1 snRNP component RBP45d regulates temperature-responsive flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.