Back

The co-occurrence of genetic variants in the TYR and OCA2 genes confers susceptibility to albinism

Green, D. J.; Michaud, V.; Lasseaux, E.; Plaisant, C.; UK Biobank Eye and Vision Consortium, ; Fitzgerald, T.; Birney, E.; Black, G. C.; Arveiler, B.; Sergouniotis, P. I.

2023-01-20 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2023.01.19.23284597 medRxiv
Show abstract

Although rare genetic conditions are mostly caused by DNA sequence alterations that functionally disrupt individual genes, large-scale studies using genome sequencing have started to unmask additional complexity. Understanding how combinations of variants in different genes shape human phenotypes is expected to provide important insights into the clinical and genetic heterogeneity of rare disorders. We used albinism, an archetypal rare condition associated with hypopigmentation, as an exemplar for the study of genetic interactions. We analysed data from the Genomics England 100,000 Genomes Project alongside a cohort of 1,120 individuals with albinism, and investigated the effect of dual heterozygosity for the combination of two established albinism-related variants: TYR:c.1205G>A (p.Arg402Gln) [rs1126809] and OCA2:c.1327G>A (p.Val443Ile) [rs74653330]. As each of these changes alone is insufficient to cause disease when present in the heterozygous state, we sought evidence of synergistic effects. We found that, when both variants are present, the probability of receiving a diagnosis of albinism is significantly increased (odds ratio 12.8; 95% confidence interval 6.0 - 24.7; p-value 2.1 x 10-8). Further analyses in an independent cohort, the UK Biobank, supported this finding and highlighted that heterozygosity for the TYR:c.1205G>A and OCA2:c.1327G>A variant combination is associated with statistically significant alterations in visual acuity and central retinal thickness (traits that are considered albinism endophenotypes). The approach discussed in this report opens up new avenues for the investigation of oligogenic patterns in apparently Mendelian disorders.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.