Aids to Improve Statistical Risk Communication in Patients Consenting for Surgery and Interventional Procedures: a Systematic Review
Jalal, A. H. B.; Chatzopoulou, D.; Marcus, H. J.; Pandit, A. S.
Show abstract
ObjectiveEvaluate the effect of risk communication tools on the understanding of statistical risk of complications occurring in patients undergoing a surgical or interventional procedure. Summary Background DataInformed consent is an essential process in clinical decision-making, through which healthcare providers educate patients about the benefits, risks and alternatives of a procedure. Numerical risk information is by nature probabilistic and difficult to communicate. Aids which support statistical risk communication and studies assessing their effectiveness are needed. MethodsA systematic search was performed across Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus and Web of Science until July 2021 with a repeated search in September 2022. Studies examining risk communication tools (e.g. informative leaflets, audio-video) in adults (age>16) patients undergoing a surgical or interventional procedure were included. Studies only assessing understanding of non-statistical aspects of the procedure were excluded. Both randomised control trials (RCTs) and observational studies were included. Cochrane risk-of-bias and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were used to assess the quality of studies. Due to heterogeneity of the studies, a narrative synthesis was performed (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022285789). ResultsA total of 4348 articles were identified and following abstract and full-text screening a total of 11 articles were included. 8 studies were RCTs and 3 were cross-sectional. The total number of adult patients was 1030. The most common risk communication tool used was additional written information (n=7). Of the 8 RCTs, 5 showed statistically significant improvements in the intervention group in outcomes relating to recall of statistical risk. Quality assessment of RCTs found some concerns with all studies. ConclusionsRisk communication tools appear to improve recall of statistical risk. Additional prospective trials are warranted which can compare various aids and determine the most effective method of improving patient understanding.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Surgery & COVID-19: A rapid scoping review of the impact of COVID-19 on surgical services during public health emergencies 94%
- Feasibility study of a randomised controlled trial of pre and postoperative nutritional supplementation in major lung surgery 93%
- Face-to-face interventions to encourage enrolment in cardiac rehabilitation; a scoping review protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- REPLICCAR II Study: Data Quality Audit in the Paulista Cardiovascular Surgery Registry 94%
- Perioperative mortality in low-, middle-, and high-income countries: Protocol for a multi-level meta-regression analysis 94%
- Evaluating user experience with immersive technology in simulation-based education: a modified Delphi study with qualitative analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Scientific hypothesis generation process in clinical research: a secondary data analytic tool versus experience study protocol 93%
- Strategies and Tools for electronic health records and physician workflow alignment: A scoping review protocol 91%
- Pilot Feasibility Clinical Trial of Virtual Reality for Pain Management During Repeated Pediatric Laser Procedures: Study Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of the Federated Data Platform's digital surgery scheduling system on elective theatre utilisation at an NHS Trust: an interrupted time series analysis 90%
- Measures of socioeconomic advantage are not independent predictors of support for healthcare AI: subgroup analysis of a national Australian survey 90%
- Development of a customised data management system for a COVID-19-adapted colorectal cancer pathway 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The effect of osteotomy technique (flat-cut vs wedge-cut Weil) on pain relief and complication incidence following surgical treatment for patients presenting with metatarsalgia in a private metropolitan clinic: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial 93%
- Decision support system to evaluate VENTilation in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (DeVENT study) – Trial Protocol 91%
- Electronic early notification of sepsis in hospitalized ward patients: a study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.