Control of Center of Mass Motion during Walking Predicts Gait and Balance in People with Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury
Dusane, S.; Shafer, A.; Ochs, W.; Cornwell, T.; Henderson, H.; Kim, K.-Y. A.; Gordon, K. E.
Show abstract
BackgroundThere is evidence that ambulatory people with incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) have an impaired ability to control lateral motion of their whole-body center of mass (COM) during walking. This impairment is believed to contribute to functional deficits in gait and balance, however that relationship is unclear. Thus, this cross-sectional study examines the relationship between the ability to control lateral COM motion during walking and functional measures of gait and balance in people with iSCI. MethodsWe assessed the ability to control lateral COM motion during walking and conducted clinical gait and balance outcome measures on twenty ambulatory adults with chronic iSCI (C1-T10 injury, American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale C or D). To assess their ability to control lateral COM motion, participants performed three treadmill walking trials. During each trial, real-time lateral COM position and a target lane were projected on the treadmill. Participants were instructed to keep their lateral COM position within the lane. If successful, an automated control algorithm progressively reduced the lane width, making the task more challenging. If unsuccessful, the lane width increased. The adaptive lane width was designed to challenge each participants maximum capacity to control lateral COM motion during walking. To quantify control of lateral COM motion, we calculated lateral COM excursion during each gait cycle and then identified the minimum lateral COM excursion occurring during five consecutive gait cycles. Our clinical outcome measures were Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Timed Up and Go test (TUG), 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT) and Functional Gait Assessment (FGA). We used a Spearman correlation analysis ({rho}) to examine the relationship between minimum lateral COM excursion and clinical measures. ResultsMinimum lateral COM excursion had significant moderate correlations with BBS ({rho}=-0.54, p=0.014), TUG ({rho}=0.59, p=0.007), 10MWT-preferred ({rho}=-0.59, p=0.006), and FGA ({rho}=-0.59, p=0.007) and a significant strong correlation with 10MWT-fast ({rho}=-0.68, p=0.001). ConclusionControl of lateral COM motion during walking predicts a wide range of clinical gait and balance measures in people with iSCI. This finding suggests the ability to control lateral COM motion during walking could be a contributing factor to gait and balance in people with iSCI.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Investigation of Nonlinear Variability Underlying Postural Control in The Injure-Limb in Individuals with and without Chronic Ankle Instability 98%
- Does increased gait variability improve stability when faced with an expected balance perturbation during treadmill walking? 98%
- Clinical measures of balance and gait cannot differentiate somatosensory impairments in people with lower-limb amputation 98%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Gait adaptation to asymmetric hip stiffness applied by a robotic exoskeleton 97%
- Effects of targeted assistance and perturbations on the relationship between pelvis motion and step width in people with chronic stroke 97%
- Application of a novel force-field to manipulate the relationship between pelvis motion and step width in human walking 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Head and body dyskinesia during gait in tactical athletes with vestibular deficit following concussion 97%
- Differences in external loads of different pitch types in Chinese male college baseball players 96%
- Do anthropometric characteristics and physical capacities of highly trained junior badminton players differ according to age and sex? 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.