Altered structural-functional coupling in Parkinson's disease
Chen, Z.; Li, G.; Zhou, L.; Zhang, L.; Liu, J.
Show abstract
BackgroundStructural-functional coupling is abnormally altered in a variety of neuropsychiatric disorders and correlates with clinical symptoms of the patients. The relationships between structural-functional coupling and clinical manifestations of Parkinsons disease (PD) remain unclear. ObjectiveThe purpose of this study is to investigate whether the structural-functional coupling changes in PD and to explore the clinical implications of this network metric. MethodsStructural 3D T1-weighted imaging, diffusion tensor imaging, and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging were performed in 22 control subjects and 34 PD patients. Two types of structural-functional coupling (node coupling and network coupling) were derived from structural and functional images. The associations between structural-functional network coupling and clinical characteristics and genetic variations of 73 PD patients from Parkinsons Progression Markers Initiative database were analyzed. ResultsPD patients exhibited reduced structural-functional node couplings in multiple brain networks compared to controls. Structural-functional node coupling could be shaped by age, sex, and disease severity. In addition, this metric was modified by TMEM175 rs34311866 and GPNMB rs199347, two genetic variants conferring PD risk. In contrast, network coupling was less affected in PD. Particularly, structural-functional network couplings were potential predictors of motor symptoms, non-motor symptoms and pathological markers of cerebrospinal fluid in PD patients. Additionally, structural-functional network coupling was significantly correlated with metrics of network topology. ConclusionsOur findings suggest that structural-functional decoupling is an essential network feature in PD and structural-functional network coupling may serve as a valuable trait-like biomarker for disease burden in PD.
Matching journals
The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Subregional analysis of the amygdala, thalamus, and hypothalamus at the pre-decline stage in Parkinson’s disease groups with later cognitive impairment 93%
- Virtual brain simulations reveal network-specific parameters in neurodegenerative dementias 92%
- Dopaminergic modulation of local non-oscillatory activity and global-network properties in Parkinson’s disease: an EEG study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Dynamic properties in functional connectivity changes and striatal dopamine deficiency in Parkinson's disease 95%
- The coupling between brain connectivity and heartbeat dynamics unveils the altered interoceptive mechanisms in Parkinson’s disease 94%
- Fading of brain network fingerprint in Parkinson’s disease predicts motor clinical impairment 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Brain microstructural changes and fatigue after COVID-19 92%
- Fixel-Based Analysis and Free Water Corrected DTI Evaluation of HIV Associated Neurocognitive Disorders 91%
- Longitudinal Assessment of Glymphatic Changes Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Insights from PVS burden and DTI-ALPS Imaging 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Simulated brain networks reflecting progression of Parkinson's disease 95%
- Regional radiomics similarity networks (R2SNs) in the human brain: reproducibility, small-world properties and a biological basis 93%
- Predicting longitudinal brain atrophy in Parkinson’s disease using a Susceptible-Infected-Removed agent-based model 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transcriptomic signatures associated with regional cortical thickness changes in Parkinson's disease 93%
- The impact of genetic risk for Alzheimers disease on the structural brain networks of young adults 92%
- Nigral volumetric and microstructural measures in individuals with scans without evidence of dopaminergic deficit 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.