Back

Understanding how a digital mental health intervention can be optimised to ensure effectiveness in the longer-term: findings from a causal mediation analyses of the CONEMO trials

Seward, N.; Loh, W. W.; Miranda, J. J.; Diez-Canseco, F.; Garcia Claro, H.; Rossi Menezes, P.; De Almeida Lopes Fernandes, I. F.; Araya, R.

2023-01-18 public and global health
10.1101/2023.01.18.23284711 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundTwo CONEMO trials in Lima, Peru and Sao Paulo, Brazil evaluated a digital mental health intervention (DMHI) based on behavioural activation (BA) that demonstrated improvements in symptoms of depression between trial arms at three-months, but not at six-months. To understand how we can optimize CONEMO in the longer-term, we therefore aim to investigate mediators through which the DMHI improved symptoms of depression at six-months, separately for the two trials and then using a pooled dataset. MethodsWe used data that included adults with depression (Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 (PHQ-9) score [≥]10) and comorbid hypertension and/or diabetes. Interventional effects were used to decompose the total effect of DMHI on symptoms of depression at six months into indirect effects via: understanding the content of the sessions without difficulty; number of activities completed that were self-selected to improve levels of BA; and levels of activation measured using the Behavioural Activation for Depression Short Form (BADS-SF). FindingsUsing the pooled dataset, understanding the content of the sessions without difficulty mediated a 10% [0.10: 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.15] improvement in PHQ-9 scores at six months; completing self-selected activities mediated a 12% improvement [0.12: 0.01 to 0.23]; and, lastly, BA mediated a 2% [0.02: 0.01, 0.05] improvement. ConclusionsOur findings suggest that targeting participants to complete activities they find enjoyable will help to improve levels of activation and maintain the effect of the CONEMO intervention in the longer-term. Improving the content of the sessions to facilitate understanding can also help to maintain improvements.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.