Back

Loss or Gain of Function? Neuronal Firing Effects of Ion Channel Mutations Depend on Cell Type

Koch, N. A.; Sonnenberg, L.; Hedrich, U. B. S.; Lauxmann, S.; Benda, J.

2023-01-17 neuroscience
10.1101/2023.01.16.524256 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Clinically relevant mutations to voltage-gated ion channels, called channelopathies, alter ion channel function, properties of ionic current and neuronal firing. The effects of ion channel mutations are routinely assessed and characterized as loss of function (LOF) or gain of function (GOF) at the level of ionic currents. Emerging personalized medicine approaches based on LOF/GOF characterization have limited therapeutic success. Potential reasons are that the translation from this binary characterization to neuronal firing especially when considering different neuronal cell types is currently not well understood. Here we investigate the impact of neuronal cell type on the firing outcome of ion channel mutations with simulations of a diverse collection of neuron models. We systematically analyzed the effects of changes in ion current properties on firing in different neuronal types. Additionally, we simulated the effects of mutations in the KCNA1 gene encoding the KV1.1 potassium channel subtype associated with episodic ataxia type 1 (EA1). These simulations revealed that the outcome of a given change in ion channel properties on neuronal excitability is cell-type dependent. As a result, cell-type specific effects are vital to a full understanding of the effects of channelopathies on neuronal excitability and present an opportunity to further the efficacy and precision of personalized medicine approaches. Significance StatementAlthough the genetic nature of ion channel mutations as well as their effects on the biophysical properties of an ion channel are routinely assessed experimentally, determination of their role in altering neuronal firing is more difficult. In particular, cell-type dependency of ion channel mutations on firing has been observed experimentally, and should be accounted for. In this context, computational modelling bridges this gap and demonstrates that the cell type in which a mutation occurs is an important determinant in the effects of neuronal firing. As a result, classification of ion channel mutations as loss or gain of function is useful to describe the ionic current but should not be blindly extend to classification at the level of neuronal firing.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
91 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.2%
2
The Journal of Physiology
150 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.7%
3
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.8%
4
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.8%
5
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Neuroscience
97 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
7
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 28%
4.3%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 9%
4.0%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 38%
2.7%
10
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
11
Journal of General Physiology
60 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 33%
1.3%
13
Neurobiology of Disease
148 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
14
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
15
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
16
Hearing Research
54 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
17
Hippocampus
56 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
18
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
19
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
21
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
European Biophysics Journal
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
23
Biological Cybernetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
24
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
26
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%