Back

A century of sampling at an ecological preserve reveals declining diversity of wild bees

Graham, K. K.; Glaum, P.; Hartert, J.; Gibbs, J.; Tucker, E.; Isaacs, R.; Valdovinos, F. S.

2023-01-18 ecology
10.1101/2023.01.15.524123 bioRxiv
Show abstract

We analyzed the wild bee community from 1921 to 2018 at a nature preserve in southern Michigan, USA using museum records and found significant shifts in the bee community. Across the near century of records, species richness peaked in the 1970s and 1980s. There was an intensive bee survey completed by F.C. Evans in 1972 and 1973. We attempted to replicate his effort in 2017 and 2018, and again found a significant decline in species richness and evenness. There was also evidence of declining abundance in many of the more common species. We also conducted traits analyses using neural networks, revealing that oligolectic ground-nesting bees and cleptoparasitic bees were more likely to be extirpated whereas polylectic cavity-nesting bees were more likely to have persisted. Additionally, larger body size was associated with increased probability of local extirpation for polylectic cavity-nesting species. Larger phenological range was associated with increased chances of persistence for polylectic species, while it was associated with extirpation for oligolectic ground-nesting species. Species in the contemporary samples also had a more southerly overall distribution compared to the historic one. Open Research StatementData used for analyses in this manuscript, including Evans original dataset from 1972/1973 with updated species nomenclature, will be permanently archived at the USDA Ag Data Commons after the acceptance of this manuscript and will be citable and accessible here: https://data.nal.usda.gov/dataset/century-sampling-ecological-preserve-reveals-declining-diversity-wild-bees. Complete instructions on how to access all data referenced in this manuscript can be found in Appendix S1.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Insect Conservation and Diversity
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.3%
2
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
8.8%
3
Biotropica
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
4
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.4%
5
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
6
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
7
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.2%
8
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
9
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
10
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.4%
11
Environmental DNA
56 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
12
Oecologia
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
13
Diversity and Distributions
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
14
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
15
Biological Conservation
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
16
Conservation Science and Practice
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
17
Insects
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
18
Ecological Entomology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
19
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
20
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.1%
21
Journal of Ecology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
22
Molecular Ecology Resources
171 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
23
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.1%
24
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
25
Ecological Applications
34 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
26
Biodiversity and Conservation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
27
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
28
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.8%
29
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
30
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%