Back

Accuracy of Smartphone-based Vital Monitoring Using Remote Photoplethysmography Technology Enabled WellFie application

Rajan, S.; Sivapuram, M. S.; Kumar, S. S.; Podder, V.

2023-01-18 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2023.01.14.23284548 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundRemote health monitoring technologies gained interest in the context of COVID-19 pandemic with potential for contactless monitoring of clinical patient status. Here, we examined whether vital parameters can be determined in a contactless manner using a novel smartphone-based technology called remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) and compared with comparable certified medical devices. MethodsWe enrolled a total of 150 normotensive adults in this comparative cross-sectional validation study. We used an advanced machine learning algorithm in the WellFie application to create computational models that predict reference systolic, diastolic blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), and respiratory rate (RR) from facial blood flow data. This study compared the predictive accuracy of smartphone-based, rPPG-enabled WellFie application with comparable certified medical devices. ResultsWhen compared with reference standards, on average our models predicted systolic blood pressure (BP) with an accuracy of 93.94%, diastolic BP with an accuracy of 92.95%, HR with an accuracy of 97.34%, RR with accuracy of 84.44%. For the WellFie application, the relative mean absolute percentage error (RMAPE) for HR was 2.66%, for RR was 15.66%, for systolic BP was 6.06%, and for diastolic BP was 7.05%. ConclusionOur results on normotensive adults demonstrates that rPPG technology-enabled Wellfie application can determine BP, HR, RR in normotensive participants with an accuracy that is comparable to clinical standards. WellFie smartphone application based on rPPG technology offers a convenient contactless video-based remote solution that could be used in any modern smartphone.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.