Back

Pathogenesis of Breakthrough Infections with SARS-CoV-2 Variants in Syrian Hamsters

Plunkard, J.; Mulka, K.; Zhou, R.; Tarwater, P.; Zhong, W.; Lowman, M.; Wong, A.; Pekosz, A.; Villano, J.

2023-01-13 microbiology
10.1101/2023.01.12.523876 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of COVID-19, has evolved into multiple variants. Animal models are important to understand variant pathogenesis, particularly for those with mutations that have significant phenotypic or epidemiological effects. Here, cohorts of naive or previously infected Syrian hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) were infected with variants to investigate viral pathogenesis and disease protection. Naive hamsters infected with SARS-CoV-2 variants had consistent clinical outcomes, tissue viral titers, and pathology, while hamsters that recovered from initial infection and were reinfected demonstrated less severe clinical disease and lung pathology than their naive counterparts. Males had more frequent clinical signs than females in most variant groups, but few sex variations in tissue viral titers and lung pathology were observed. These findings support the use of Syrian hamsters as a SARS-CoV-2 model and highlight the importance of considering sex differences when using this species. ImportanceWith the continued circulation and emergence of new severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants, understanding differences between the initial and a subsequent reinfection on disease pathogenesis is critical and highly relevant. This study characterizes Syrian hamsters as an animal model to study reinfection with SARS-CoV-2. Previous infection reduced the disease severity of reinfection with different SARS-CoV-2 variants.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.