Data-driven Targeting of COVID-19 Vaccination Programs: An Analysis of the Evidence on Impact, Implementation, Ethics and Equity
McLaren, Z. M.
Show abstract
The data-driven targeting of COVID-19 vaccination programs is a major determinant of the ongoing toll of COVID-19. Targeting of access to, outreach about and incentives for vaccination can reduce total deaths by 20-50 percent relative to a first-come-first-served allocation. This piece performs a systematic review of the modeling literature on the relative benefits of targeting different groups for vaccination and evaluates the broader scholarly evidence - including analyses of real-world challenges around implementation, equity, and other ethical considerations - to guide vaccination targeting strategies. Three-quarters of the modeling studies reviewed concluded that the most effective way to save lives, reduce hospitalizations and mitigate the ongoing toll of COVID-19 is to target vaccination program resources to high-risk people directly rather than reducing transmission by targeting low-risk people. There is compelling evidence that defining vulnerability based on a combination of age, occupation, underlying medical conditions and geographic location is more effective than targeting based on age alone. Incorporating measures of economic vulnerability into the prioritization scheme not only reduces mortality but also improves equity. The data-driven targeting of COVID-19 vaccination program resources benefits everyone by efficiently mitigating the worst effects of the pandemic until the threat of COVID-19 has passed.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors indicating intention to vaccinate with a COVID-19 vaccine among older U.S. Adults 94%
- The Impact of Vaccination to Control COVID-19 Burden in the United States: A Simulation Modeling Approach 94%
- Strategies that make vaccination easy and promote autonomy could increase COVID-19 vaccination in those who remain hesitant 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Real-world Effectiveness and Causal Mediation Study of BNT162b2 on Long COVID Risks in Children and Adolescents 92%
- Population immunity of natural infection, primary-series vaccination, and booster vaccination in Qatar during the COVID-19 pandemic: An observational study 92%
- The potential impact of vaccine passports on inclination to accept COVID-19 vaccinations in the United Kingdom: evidence from a large cross-sectional survey and modelling study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 vaccine uptake and effectiveness by time since vaccination in the Western Cape province, South Africa: An observational cohort study during 2020-2022 94%
- The potential economic impact of the updated COVID-19 mRNA fall 2023 vaccines in Japan 93%
- Race-ethnicity and Perceptional Determinants of COVID-19 Vaccination Intentions: A Cross-sectional Study Among Health Workers and the General Population in the San Francisco Bay Area 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Joint Impact of COVID-19 Vaccination and Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions on Infections, Hospitalizations, and Mortality: An Agent-Based Simulation 95%
- Identifying silent COVID-19 infections among children is critical for controlling the pandemic 94%
- Health impact and cost of COVID-19 prophylaxis with monoclonal antibodies 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.