Back

Data-driven Targeting of COVID-19 Vaccination Programs: An Analysis of the Evidence on Impact, Implementation, Ethics and Equity

McLaren, Z. M.

2023-01-13 health policy
10.1101/2023.01.12.23284481 medRxiv
Show abstract

The data-driven targeting of COVID-19 vaccination programs is a major determinant of the ongoing toll of COVID-19. Targeting of access to, outreach about and incentives for vaccination can reduce total deaths by 20-50 percent relative to a first-come-first-served allocation. This piece performs a systematic review of the modeling literature on the relative benefits of targeting different groups for vaccination and evaluates the broader scholarly evidence - including analyses of real-world challenges around implementation, equity, and other ethical considerations - to guide vaccination targeting strategies. Three-quarters of the modeling studies reviewed concluded that the most effective way to save lives, reduce hospitalizations and mitigate the ongoing toll of COVID-19 is to target vaccination program resources to high-risk people directly rather than reducing transmission by targeting low-risk people. There is compelling evidence that defining vulnerability based on a combination of age, occupation, underlying medical conditions and geographic location is more effective than targeting based on age alone. Incorporating measures of economic vulnerability into the prioritization scheme not only reduces mortality but also improves equity. The data-driven targeting of COVID-19 vaccination program resources benefits everyone by efficiently mitigating the worst effects of the pandemic until the threat of COVID-19 has passed.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 6%
23.1%
2
Medical Decision Making
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.8%
3
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.4%
5
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
7
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.1%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 28%
3.3%
9
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
10
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.5%
11
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
13
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
17
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
18
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
19
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
20
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
23 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
22
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
24
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
COVID
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
26
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
27
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%