Back

Study on Spatio-temporal Prevalence and Hematological Attributes of Bovine Babesiosis in Cattle Population of Layyah, Southern Punjab, Pakistan

Lashari, M. H.; Ahmad, H.; Rehman, Z.-U.-

2023-01-13 immunology
10.1101/2023.01.09.523272 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The objective of the present study was to investigate the spatiotemporal prevalence of bovine babesiosis in cattle population (n=376) of District Layyah, South Punjab, Pakistan as affected by location, age, breed, gender and seasons. Blood samples were collected aseptically and assessed for babesiosis through microscopy and PCR, and through automated analyzer for hematological attributes. Overall results of prevalence as attained through PCR in cattle population showed a significantly (P[≤]0.05) lower prevalence of 19.4% (n=72/376) as compared to 37.2% (n=140/276) through microscopy. None of the studied cattle from Cholistani breed were Babesia-positive. However, significantly (P[≤]0.05) higher prevalence was noticed for crossbred cattle (46.7%, n= 50/107) followed by that in Friesian (16.1%, n= 10/62), Jersey (7%, n= 5/71) and Sahiwal (6.9%, n= 7/101) cattle breeds. Female cattle (19.5%, n= 55/281) and age group 1 (Up to 2 years) (40%, n= 42/105) had higher prevalence of Babesia as ascertained through PCR in comparison to their counterpart groups. Significantly (P[≤]0.05) higher prevalence of 35.9% (n=60/167) was shown in summer as compared to that in winter season (5.7%, n= 12/209). All the positive samples produced the 490bp amplicons specific and typical for Babesia bigemina. Regarding hematology, hemoglobin concentration, erythrocytic count, hematocrit and mean corpuscular volume were significantly (P[≤]0.05) lower in babesia-positive cattle as compared to healthy ones. In a nutshell, indigenous cattle breeds are tick-resistant hardy breeds and do not show severe signs of babesiosis as compared to exotic and crossbred cattle. Furthermore, Southern Punjab area of Pakistan has a different spatiotemporal distribution of babesiosis with bigemina being predominant.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 2%
41.9%
2
Pan African Medical Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
50% of probability mass above
3
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 30%
3.4%
5
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.4%
6
Preventive Veterinary Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
7
Infection, Genetics and Evolution
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
8
Journal of Dairy Science
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
9
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.5%
10
Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
11
Developmental & Comparative Immunology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
12
Parasites & Vectors
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
13
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
14
Archives of Virology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
15
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
109 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
16
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
17
BioMed Research International
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
18
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
19
Virology
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
20
Journal of Virological Methods
37 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
21
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
37 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
22
Molecular Immunology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
23
Immunology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
24
Immunogenetics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.5%
25
Microbial Pathogenesis
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%