Back

Fast and Accurate Cell Tracking: a real-time cell segmentation and tracking algorithm to instantly export quantifiable cellular characteristics from large scale image data

Chou, T.-C.; You, L.; Beerens, C.; Feller, K. J.; Chien, M.-P.

2023-01-09 bioengineering
10.1101/2023.01.09.523224 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Quantitative characterizations of cellular dynamics and features of individual cells from a large heterogenous population is essential to identify rare, disease-driving cells, which often exhibit aberrant cellular behaviors like abnormal division, aggressive migration or irregular phylogenetic cell lineages. A recent development in the combination of high-throughput screening microscopy with single cell profiling provides an unprecedented opportunity to decipher the underlying mechanisms of disease-driving phenotypes observed under a microscope. However, accurately and instantly processing large amounts of image data like longitudinal time lapse movies remains a technical challenge when an immediate analysis output (in minutes) of quantitative characterizations is required after data acquisition. Here we present a Fast and Accurate real-time Cell Tracking (FACT) algorithm, which combines GPU-based, ground truth-assisted trainable Weka segmentation and real-time Gaussian mixture model-based cell linking. FACT also implements an automatic cell track correction function to improve the tracking accuracy. With FACT, we can segment [~]20,000 cells in 2 seconds ([~]4.5-27.5 times faster than state-of-the-art), and can export quantifiable features from the cell tracking results minutes after data acquisition (independent of the number of acquired image frames) with average 90-95% tracking precision. Such performance is not feasible with state-of-the-art cell tracking algorithms. We applied FACT to real-time identify directionally migrating glioblastoma cells with 96% precision and to identify rare, irregular cell lineages in a population of [~]10,000 cells from a 24hr-time lapse movie with an average 91% F1 score, results from both were exported instantly, mere minutes after image acquisition.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
15.5%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.5%
3
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.9%
4
Advanced Intelligent Systems
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 14%
5.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.5%
7
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.7%
8
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.2%
9
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
10
Nature Biotechnology
172 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
11
npj Imaging
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
12
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.8%
13
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
14
Light: Science & Applications
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
15
Nature Biomedical Engineering
47 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
16
Journal of Cell Biology
392 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
18
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
19
Small Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
20
ACS Photonics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
21
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
22
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.1%
23
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.9%
24
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
Methods
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
26
Nature Computational Science
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
28
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%