Longitudinal phase 2 clinical trials of live, attenuated tularemia vaccine in otherwise healthy research laboratory workers operating in containment laboratories
Saunders, D. L.; Pierson, B. C.; Haller, J.; Norris, S. L.; Cardile, A. P.; Reisler, R. B.; Okwesili, A. C.; Boudreau, E.; Rusnak, J.; Danner, D. K.; Purcell, B. K.; Barth, J. F.; Tompkins, E. M.; Downs, I. L.; Liggett, D.; Pettit, P.; Pratt, T.; Goldberg, M.; Kortepeter, M. G.; Guerena, F. B.; Aldis, J. W.; Keshtkar, M.; Pittman, P. R.
Show abstract
BackgroundTularemia is a bacterial disease caused by the intracellular bacterium Francisella tularensis (F. tularensis or Ft). It has been weaponized historically by multiple state actors due to its low infectious aerosol dose, high morbidity and high mortality rate of the pneumonic form. The US Army developed the attenuated Live Vaccine Strain (LVS) from stocks provided by the former Soviet Union in the 1950s. The vaccine has proven to be safe and immunogenic over the ensuing decades in numerous clinical trials and animal as well as human challenge studies. Despite the threat, there are no FDA-approved vaccines nor clinical stage candidates against tularemia. LVS remains unlicensed due to instability in culture and the potential for reversion to the wild-type pathogen. We report here two sequential LVS trials in at-risk laboratory personnel working on tularemia in bio-containment. MethodsVolunteers received a single dose of the Live Vaccine Strain (LVS) live, attenuated tularemia vaccine by scarification under 2 FDA-regulated non-randomized, single-arm protocols (IND 157). Positive immunization was based on local scarification site take reaction, and either a >1:20 tularemia antigen microagglutination (MA) titer (protocol FY03-24; 2004-8) or greater than 4-fold rise in MA titer (protocol FY07-15; 2009-2017). Those still negative by week 4 were offered a second dose. ResultsThe LVS vaccine was safe, well tolerated and highly immunogenic. Between the two studies, all recipients (100%) had positive take reactions, with 95.5% of those in study FY03-24 having a positive response following initial vaccination. All but 3 subjects (98%) in protocol FY03-24 had positive MA titer results defined as >1:20, most within 28-35 days. In protocol FY07-15, 95% of subjects had a 4-fold or greater rise in MA titer, the primary immunogenicity endpoint for that study. ConclusionsLVS vaccine administered to laboratory workers at risk for tularemia exposure over a 12 year period was safe and highly immunogenic. Findings were in line with more than 4 decades of prior similar results. Response rates remained robust despite the vaccine lots employed having been manufactured 2-3 decades prior to the present studies. In the absence of a commercial development effort, or another tularemia vaccine in clinical development, a vaccine protocol under investigational new drug (IND) application could be considered based on the large body of favorable data for this vaccine. The results as well as historical comparator data presented here should serve as a benchmark for future studies.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety and Immunogenicity of An Egg-Based Inactivated Newcastle Disease Virus Vaccine Expressing SARS-CoV-2 Spike: Interim Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 1/2 Trial in Vietnam 97%
- A randomized, double-blind phase I clinical trial of two recombinant dimeric RBD COVID-19 vaccine candidates: safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity 96%
- Immunogenicity and Safety of a 14-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide conjugate vaccine (PNEUBEVAX 14TM) administered to 6-8 weeks old healthy Indian Infants: A single blind, randomized, active-controlled, Phase-III study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety and immunogenicity of a heterologous booster of protein subunit vaccine MVC-COV1901 after two doses of adenoviral vector vaccine AZD1222 96%
- A First in Human Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of a G Protein Based Recombinant Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccine in Healthy Adults 18-45 Years 96%
- Safety and immunogenicity of the BBIBP-CorV vaccine in adolescents aged 12-17 years in Thai population, prospective cohort study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Homologous and heterologous boosting of the ChAdOx1-S1-S COVID-19 vaccine with the SCB-2019 vaccine candidate: a randomized, observer-blinded, controlled, phase 2 study 96%
- Adverse effects and antibody titers in response to the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in a prospective study of healthcare workers 96%
- Global Safety Assessment of Adverse Events of Special Interest Following 2 Years of Use and 772 Million Administered Doses of mRNA-1273 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Immunogenicity and safety of a recombinant adenovirus type-5 COVID-19 vaccine in adults: data from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose, phase 3 trial in Russia 95%
- Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a third dose of BNT162b2 vaccine for COVID-19 after a primary regimen with BBIBP-CorV or BNT162b2 vaccines in Lima, Peru 95%
- Immunogenicity and safety of Quadrivalent Influenza HA vaccine compared with Trivalent Influenza HA vaccine and evaluation of Quadrivalent Influenza HA vaccine batch-to-batch consistency in Indonesian children and adults 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Differences in IgG antibody responses following BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 Vaccines 95%
- Evaluation of the Roche SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antibody Test in samples from vaccinated individuals 94%
- SARS-CoV-2 Convalescent Sera Binding and Neutralizing Antibody Concentrations Compared with COVID-19 Vaccine Efficacy Estimates Against Symptomatic Infection 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.