Back

Scalable Apparatus to Measure Posture and Locomotion (SAMPL): a high-throughput solution to study unconstrained vertical behavior in small animals

Zhu, Y.; Auer, F.; Gelnaw, H.; Davis, S. N.; Hamling, K. R.; May, C. E.; Ahamed, H.; Ringstad, N.; Nagel, K. I.; Schoppik, D.

2023-01-07 neuroscience
10.1101/2023.01.07.523102 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Balance and movement are impaired in a wide variety of neurological disorders. Recent advances in behavioral monitoring provide unprecedented access to posture and loco-motor kinematics, but without the throughput and scalability necessary to screen candidate genes / potential therapeutics. We present a powerful solution: a Scalable Apparatus to Measure Posture and Locomotion (SAMPL). SAMPL includes extensible imaging hardware and low-cost open-source acquisition software with real-time processing. We first demonstrate that SAMPLs hardware and acquisition software can acquire data from D. melanogaster, C.elegans, and D. rerio as they move vertically. Next, we leverage SAMPLs throughput to rapidly (two weeks) gather a new zebrafish dataset. We use SAMPLs analysis and visualization tools to replicate and extend our current understanding of how zebrafish balance as they navigate through a vertical environment. Next, we discover (1) that key kinematic parameters vary systematically with genetic background, and (2) that such background variation is small relative to the changes that accompany early development. Finally, we simulate SAMPLs ability to resolve differences in posture or vertical navigation as a function of effect size and data gathered - key data for screens. Taken together, our apparatus, data, and analysis provide a powerful solution for laboratories using small animals to investigate balance and locomotor disorders at scale. More broadly, SAMPL is both an adaptable resource for laboratories looking process video-graphic measures of behavior in real-time, and an exemplar of how to scale hardware to enable the throughput necessary for screening.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.