Back

Mechanostat parameters estimated from time-lapsed in vivo micro-computed tomography data of mechanically driven bone adaptation are logarithmically dependent on loading frequency

C. Marques, F.; Boaretti, D.; Walle, M.; C. Scheuren, A.; A. Schulte, F.; Muller, R.

2023-01-08 bioengineering
10.1101/2023.01.07.523082 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mechanical loading is a key factor governing bone adaptation. Both preclinical and clinical studies have demonstrated its effects on bone tissue, which were also notably predicted in the mechanostat theory. Indeed, existing methods to quantify bone mechanoregulation have successfully associated the frequency of (re)modeling events with local mechanical signals, combining time-lapsed in vivo micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) imaging and micro-finite element (micro-FE) analysis. However, a correlation between the local surface velocity of (re)modeling events and mechanical signals has not been shown. As many degenerative bone diseases have also been linked to impaired bone (re)modeling, this relationship could provide an advantage in detecting the effects of such conditions and advance our understanding of the underlying mechanisms. Therefore, in this study, we introduce a novel method to estimate (re)modeling velocity curves from time-lapsed in vivo mouse caudal vertebrae data under static and cyclic mechanical loading. These curves can be fitted with piecewise linear functions as proposed in the mechanostat theory. Accordingly, new (re)modeling parameters can be derived from such data, including formation saturation levels, resorption velocity modulus, and (re)modeling thresholds. Our results revealed that the norm of the gradient of strain energy density yielded the highest accuracy in quantifying mechanoregulation data using micro-FE analysis with homogeneous material properties, while effective strain was the best predictor for micro-FE analysis with heterogeneous material properties. Furthermore, (re)modeling velocity curves could be accurately described with piecewise linear and hyperbola functions (root mean square error below 0.2 {micro}m/day for weekly analysis), and several (re)modeling parameters determined from these curves followed a logarithmic relationship with loading frequency. Crucially, (re)modeling velocity curves and derived parameters could detect differences in mechanically driven bone adaptation, which complemented previous results showing a logarithmic relationship between loading frequency and net change in bone volume fraction over four weeks. Together, we expect this data to support the calibration of in silico models of bone adaptation and the characterization of the effects of mechanical loading and pharmaceutical treatment interventions in vivo.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.2%
2
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
3
Bone
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.4%
4
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 22%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 21%
4.1%
7
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
8
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
9
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.7%
10
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
11
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
12
JBMR Plus
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.7%
14
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
15
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.7%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.7%
17
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
18
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
20
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
21
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
24
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
25
APL Bioengineering
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
26
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.5%