Back

Sniffer beetles: Odor imaging reveals congeneric herbivores identify their congeneric hostplants based on differential olfactory perceptions

Binayak, G.; Deshpande, A.; Dahanukar, N.; Ingale, P.; Subaharan, K.; Munikrishnappa, V. K. T.; Ghate, H.; Pandit, S.

2023-01-06 ecology
10.1101/2023.01.06.522974 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Hostplant location and conspecific aggregation on the hostplant are the key behaviors of several herbivore insect species. The cues used by insects for host identification and aggregation initiation have been researched mainly using a single hostplant species. The chemical repertoire of plants, including volatile and non-volatile secondary metabolites, is critical in mediating these processes. In natural ecosystems, often several closely related plant species co-occur. Despite these related plant species similar chemical repertoires, insects proficiently locate their hosts. How they resolve such complex chemical cues is understudied. To study the basis of such resolution, we used five commonly co-occurring Ipomoea spp. as hostplants and four Chiridopsis spp. (beetles) as their herbivores. In this wild sympatric system from the Western Ghats of India, monophagous, biphagous, and oligophagous Chiridopsis spp. are specialist herbivores of different Ipomoea species. We studied the chemistry of these beetles stringent host-specificity by determining the roles of chemical cues in hostplant location and aggregation. We analyzed beetles hostplant preferences vis-a-vis hostplant volatile blends. We found plant volatiles as the primary hostplant identification cues. Using GC-MS/-FID and SPME headspace analyses, we characterized odor blends of the five Ipomoea spp. and identified putative attractants and repellents for each Chiridopsis sp. using multivariate statistics. We determined their attractant or deterrent natures using behavioral assays and ascertained their perception by the antennal olfactory receptors using electroantennography. Beetles responded to these compounds only when they were delivered via their hostplant odor blends. Beetles did not respond when these compounds were given singularly or via non-host odor blends. We infer that these semiochemicals attractant, repellent, or neutral characters are associated with the hostplants volatile blend-the matrix. We integrated the multi-source data to visualize this in-flight odor perception by representing odor as color variations or odor images. Odor imaging revealed beetles differential olfactory perception of different hostplants and indicated how a beetle distinguishes between two closely-related plant species. Additionally, it showed a different olfactory perception of the same hostplant by different closely-related beetle species, suggesting they have evolved to recognize the same odor using different components. Our work demonstrates that the hostplants odor blend matrix is crucial; beetles do not respond to attractants/ repellents without it. Together, the closely-related plant species form an ideal system to understand how insects perceive subtle differences between hosts and non-host cues in nature. This investigation also underlines the relevance of studying entire odor blends over individual compounds.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Chemical Ecology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 3%
11.7%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 22%
7.8%
4
Insects
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
5
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.3%
6
Ecological Entomology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
7
Pest Management Science
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
8
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
9
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.1%
10
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
11
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
12
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
13
Plant Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
14
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
15
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
16
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.7%
17
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.7%
18
Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
19
Journal of Economic Entomology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
20
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
21
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
22
Environmental Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
23
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
24
The ISME Journal
228 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
25
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
Insect Conservation and Diversity
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
28
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
29
Fungal Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
30
BMC Plant Biology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%